Why Benjamin Netanyahu Gave The Pope A Book About The Spanish Inquisition

Today Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Pope Francis at the Vatican. According to the DPA news agency, Netanyahu brought with him a slightly unusual gift: A book about the Spanish inquisition.

Source: Yahoo.com

Christian shop accused of anti-semitism for lacking Jewish decorations

Hobby Lobby, the Oklahoma-based arts and crafts company founded by Christian evangelical David Green, stands accused of anti-Semitism because its stores do not carry Jewish holiday decorations.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/hobby-lobby-accused-anti-semitism-article-1.1473330#ixzz2geBeo2pF

Rabbi: Goyim have sex with dogs

Poor “goyyim,” Leches said, have “nothing else to do in life, [and therefore are] only thinking 24 hours about sex” with each other, members of their own families – and, Leches claimed, with “dogs.”

Source: http://www.davidduke.com/?p=40161

Palestinians plan to create an "Anti-Semitic state", that does not welcome more Jewish settlers

Says:
David Bedein, who grew up in Philadelphia and moved to Israel in 1970 at the age of 20, is an MSW community organizer by profession and an expereinced investigative journalis
Source: http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/challenge-to-the-global-forum-against-anti-semitism-the-genesis-of-an-anti-semitic-state/

Israel Hints at New Strikes, Warning Syria Not to Hit Back

Amos Yadlin, Israel’s former military intelligence chief who now directs the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, said that the timing of the warning could have been linked to intelligence Israel had received about something it wanted to prevent.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/world/middleeast/israeli-official-signals-possibility-of-more-syria-strikes.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&

Jews blatantly demand Ukraine to conform with their definition of what is "offensive"

 Eduard Dolinsky, director of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, told JTA:

“The Justice Ministry and politicians should adjust their definitions and language according to what Ukrainian Jews consider offensive"

Source: http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/12/20/3114966/ukrainian-government-sanctions-anti-semitic-pejorative

Shimon Peres:

Source: http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=192392

Peres said that, "for our existence, we need the friendship of the United States of America."

(TRUE)

Speaking of how Israel can give back to the US, he said that just "as the US is trying to understand the security needs of Israel, we Israelis ourselves must understand the security needs of the US." He continued, "We cannot give back to the United States what the US is giving us, but in our own small way, we can be of help."

(WHAT KIND OF HELP?)

Connecting two of the largest issues on the Israeli and American agenda, the president said Israel could be of help to the US by enabling an "anti-Iran coalition in the Middle East, and the contribution will not be by declaration, but if we stop  the secondary conflict between us and the Palestinians," in order to allow the US to focus on the Iranian threat.

(SO, IN OTHER WORDS, ISRAEL WOULD "HELP" UNITED STATES FOR A "THREAT" THAT IS THEIRS TO BEGIN WITH...)

Gentiles Exist Only to Serve jews

Source: http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?ID=191782&R=R1

The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews, according to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,” he said in his weekly Saturday night sermon on the laws regarding the actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on Shabbat.

According to Yosef, the lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.

“In Israel, death has no dominion over them... With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

This is his servant... That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” Yosef said.


“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat.

That is why gentiles were created,” he added.

Yosef’s Saturday night sermons have seen many controversial statements from the 90-year-old rabbi. In August, Yosef caused a diplomatic uproar when he wished a plague upon the Palestinian people and their leaders, a curse he retracted a few weeks later, when he blessed them along with all of Israel’s other peace-seeking neighbors.

Followup: Teacher's Holocaust denial causes uproar

The investigation involves a text message sent to multiple students that said: "Men are supposed to act like men and not be pansy asses ... only girls are allowed to be that way you slut(t)y Jews ... Please feel free to (forward message) or I will slit your throats personally ... And yes I'm related to Hitler."

Source: http://www.lvrj.com/news/teachers-holocaust-denial-causes-uproar-79600822.html

---

COMMENT
This confirms the age-old Polish saying: The Jew cries in pain while he hits you. I don't know what to think of this event: most likely this barely literate "teacher" is either crazy or naturally incoherent. Whatever the situation, Jews will capitalize on any inconsequential event that might serve their ethnic agenda. The "helpless righteous victim" they are playing over hides a real concern over the possibility of an INDEPENDENT inquiry on Holocaust. One must not overlook the fact that "holocaust denial" (which in a Jew's mind means not DENIAL but FAILURE TO ACCEPT IT AD LITERAM) is still barely legal in US, where the First Ammendment protects one's right of free speech, EXCEPT when speech incites to illegal actions. This condition has been played over by Jews to harrass those they hate, claiming everyone is after them.

Given there is no leverage to Jewish power in US, let alone the thoroughly judaized colonies of Europe, one's expectation is that in a decade at most this legal "glitch" will be dealt with and the "anti-Semites" (which includes all people that in some way or another adverse to Semitism) will be sent "where they belong" (according to Jews). When that happens, the last remnant of democracy in the Western World will vaporize and US will join its Northern neighbor (Canada) into full fledged totalitarianism, where the will of the Jews can only be obeyed without questioning.

Benjain Netanyahu upset on Holocaust-unbelievers: Is this a lie?

Source: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/09/25/benjamin-netanyahu-is-this-a-lie.aspx

The Holocaust must never be forgotten for mankind to progress

Source: http://www.dailytribune.com/articles/2009/11/15/opinion/srv0000006812760.txt

Apparently, comments aren't censored (yet):

Mike T wrote on Nov 15, 2009 9:03 AM:

" Why is the Holocaust more important than all the other genocides and mass killings that have taken place throughout history? Why do we see endless efforts to promote Holocaust education and remembrance but nary a word spoken about the Armenian genocide, Pol Pot's regime, the Nanking Massacre, etc.? It seems rather evident that there are those who believe that Jewish lives are more important than the lives of everyone else. "

Report Abuse

Mike T wrote on Nov 15, 2009 9:11 AM:

" By the way, before anyone says it: Yes, I know this particular article gives token mention to genocides other than the Holocaust. That doesn't change my point, though. Why do we hear about the Holocaust so much more often than about other genocides? How many museums in the US are dedicated to genocides other than the Holocaust? How many educational programs in schools? How many survivors' organizations? Again, it seems clear that the Holocaust is being promoted as "unique," and that's because many believe that Jewish lives are more valuable than the lives of the rest of us. "

Report Abuse

Vladimir wrote on Nov 15, 2009 9:50 AM:

" Jews murdered 66,000,000 Russians with their communist terror. That is the Holocaust. I am horrified and offended that Jews are still trying to play "victim" when it is well known that as a nation, they are guilty of the most heinous crimes against humanity. "

Report Abuse

Rob wrote on Nov 15, 2009 1:52 PM:

" The holocaust is a crock and a propaganda ploy for the jews to gain leverage over whites my making them feel guilty and obligated to them. If there was any truth to the holocaust, they wouldn't have laws in Europe throwing historians in prison who questions its details and veracity. There was a saying in communist countries: You can always tell who it is who runs a society. It is the people you are never allowed to criticize or question. "

Report Abuse

US under Jews: US ‘Dismayed,’ but Israel to Build 900 New Settlement Units

Author: Jason Ditz

Source: http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/17/us-dismayed-but-israel-to-build-900-new-settlement-units/

The White House is officially “dismayed” tonight following the announcement that the Israeli government intends to build 900 new housing units inside of a settlement in Jerusalem.

The hotly disputed territory of Gilo, where the new settlements will be built, lies in East Jerusalem. The region was captured in the 1967 Six Day War, and has been annexed by the Israeli government.

That annexation, according to Israeli officials, puts the settlement construction in a different category than the rest of the West Bank. They maintain, despite a complete lack of international recognition, that Gilo is part of Israel proper and that despite Jerusalem’s planning committee treating it like a settlement expansion, and the international community recognizing it as a settlement, it isn’t technically a settlement.

Rather officials say that Netanyahu’s trademark “restraint,” a euphemism for his hypothetically offered three month freeze in new building permits in the West Bank ex-Jerusalem, doesn’t apply in Gilo, and that the international community has no right to criticize any construction in Jerusalem.

Israel Rejects Probe Of Gaza War Conduct

Author: [author]

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/16/AR2009091603427.html

Israel on Wednesday rejected a U.N. panel's call to open an independent inquiry into its wartime conduct in the Gaza Strip and launched a diplomatic campaign to thwart any prosecution of its soldiers in an international tribunal.

Officials said President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and other senior ministers were telephoning counterparts abroad in an effort to discredit a harshly critical report by the fact-finding panel. The report concluded that both sides committed war crimes during an Israeli offensive last winter that took aim at rocket-firing militants in the Palestinian enclave but also left hundreds of civilians dead.

Peres declared at a news conference that the report, issued Tuesday by South African judge Richard Goldstone, is one-sided and "makes a mockery of history."

"It draws no distinction between the attacker and the attacked," Peres said. "The report essentially grants legitimacy to acts of terrorism, shooting and killing, and ignores the right and duty of any country to self-defense, as outlined in the U.N. charter."

Israel's assertive response reflected official concern that the 22-day assault on Gaza was a diplomatic and strategic defeat for the Jewish state, even though it has sharply reduced rocket fire from the Hamas-ruled territory.

UN members must stand up against Iranian ruler

Author: Maureen Shamee

Source: http://ejpress.org/article/39160

NEW YORK (EJP)---World Jewish Congress (WJC) President Ronald S. Lauder said the latest denial of the Holocaust by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is “another good reason for United Nations members to walk out on him" when he speaks before the United Nations in New York this week.  
At an anti-Israel rally in Tehran on Friday, Ahmadinejad declared that the "Holocaust is a false claim, a fairy tale, used as a pretext for crimes against humanity."

_______________________________________________________________________________________

FOLLOW UP:
What masters decree, slaves follow:
Walkout at Iran leader's speech
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8008572.stm
The US, Israel, Canada, Australia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and New Zealand had all boycotted the conference being held in Geneva, in protest at Mr Ahmadinejad's appearance.

Kevin MacDonald: How Jews See Themselves

Author: How Jews See Themselves

Source: Kevin MacDonald

Any group that expects to survive into the long term future should be aware of current trends and how they will influence the group. Jews take such planning quite seriously. The Jewish People Policy Planning Institute has assumed the role of long term planning for the Jewish people, not only in Israel but also the Diaspora. The JPPPI is an independent think tank that reports to the Israeli government and has close ties with other Jewish organizations. Its mission is “to promote the thriving of the Jewish people via professional strategic thinking and planning on issues of primary concern to world Jewry. JPPPI's work is based on deep commitment to the future of the Jewish people with Israel as its core state.”
The chairman of the Board of Directors of JPPPI from 2002 until early 2009 was Dennis Ross — the same Dennis Ross who has played a major role in US policy in the Middle East in the Bush I and Clinton administrations and was director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy — a hard-line pro-Israel lobbying group. Ross gave up his position with the JPPPI after he was named as the Obama administration’s top envoy to the Middle East, a position where he will be able to influence policy on Iran and other issues deemed vital to Israel. (Ross remains a "Consultant" at WINEP.)
It is noteworthy that no one complains when Ross is appointed to such an important US foreign policy position despite his close ties to Israel and the Israel Lobby; but there is major hysteria when people point out that Charles Freeman (Obama's nominee for the head of the National Intelligence Council) has an association with a group funded by Saudi Arabia.  
The JPPPI’s report Facing Tomorrow 2008 is a sort of State of the Union document for Judaism — a description of the state of Judaism and what challenges are on the horizon. In scope and intention, it reminds one of theNational Policy Institute's report "The State of White America."
Not surprisingly, there is great concern about Iran as an "existential threat" — presumably a major area of interest for the former chairman of JPPPI’s Board of Directors in his new position in the US State Department.  
The Jewish people must, as the highest priority, develop an appropriate response to the Iranian nuclear threat to Israel and to global stability as a whole. While there is no ambiguity about the need to do so in Israel, it is necessary to mobilize Jewish opinion around the world as well. The American Jewish community cannot be intimidated either by a post Iraq syndrome in the United States, or by the false and pernicious allegations of Professors Walt and Mearsheimer, or former President Carter. 
Jews around the world are encouraged to mobilize to combat the threat to Israel represented by Iran. The assumption is that Jews have common interests as Jews no matter what country they happen to live in. One is reminded of other eras when Jews have put up a unified front against a particular country because of specific Jewish interests. For example, the organized Jewish community opposed Russia from 1881 to 1917 — a position that led to charges of disloyalty in several countries.
One might think that such a view would leave Jews in the Diaspora open to the charge of disloyalty, but the problem is easily finessed: Jews in the Diaspora are told to frame Israel's concerns about Iran as a global threat, not simply as a threat to Israel.
The report advocates putting pressure on China, Russia, and moderate Arab states in order to develop the widest possible coalition: “For instance, currently, the US negotiates with China, bilaterally and multilaterally on both currency issues and on Iran, without linking the two issues. Perhaps they need to be linked.” The message is that Jews in the US should pressure the US government to use any leverage it has with China to develop a coalition against Iran.  
The report is quite clear that the influential writings of former President Carter and professors Mearsheimer and Walt are major obstacles.  As I have noted before, these critics of Israel are important because they are associated with elite institutions, and their critique is sober, factually based, and constitutes a moral indictment of Israel. We can expect more attacks on these figures in the future.
Relatedly, the report recommends that Diaspora Jewry do its utmost to undermine the moral critique of Israel. Jews must combat portrayals of Israel as a state that is “colonialist, violates human rights, and engaged in unacceptable behavior that could be described as Apartheid and even Nazism.”  Diaspora Jews should also combat charges of dual loyalty.  Amazingly, despite the assumption of common Jewish interests no matter what country they live in, without any sense of irony the report notes that Dennis Ross — Exhibit A on the dual loyalty issue — will soon be publishing a book on these issues.
And Ross isn't the only high level American diplomat involved in this report for an Israeli think tank: Stuart Eizenstat is the author of a major section on "Mega-Trends in the Next Five Years which will Impact on World Jewry and Israel."
The situation is exactly the same as the involvement of prominent American neocons (Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David and Meyrav Wurmser) in the notorious "A Clean Break" report for an Israeli think tank. This report, which advocated regime change in the Middle East by many of the architects of the American invasion of Iraq, was also presented to the Israeli government.
There is deep concern about Jewish identification, marriage, and fertility. Jews have the lowest birth rate in the world (1.5–1.7). In the Diaspora, “there is a slow, steady, seemingly inexorable decline in an already diminished population.” In Israel, the Jewish population is increasing but the Arab Israelis and Palestinians are increasing faster. “Between the Mediterranean and the Jordan Sea, there may be a majority of Palestinians by mid-century. Time is not on Israel’s side.” Nevertheless it is important to “Ensure that the borders of the State of Israel guarantee a clear Jewish majority.”
The solution is to encourage fertility not only by aiding and promoting Jewish births, but by funding programs that strengthen Jewish identification: 
Massive investment should be undertaken to improve knowledge and transmission of Jewish identity through expanding existing and new networks of Jewish schools, and the best forms of informal education such as Birthright, camps, youth movements, adolescent education and adult education.
All of these policies would be viewed as unvarnished racism if adopted by Europeans or the European Diaspora.  
The report on geopolitical trends by Stuart Eizenstat is quite blunt, noting the decline of the West and the emergence of a multipolar world with the rise of China and India. Israel must ready itself for a world no longer dominated by the US, but Eizenstat projects that the US will be primus inter pares for at least another generation. There is also concern that because of the debacle in Iraq, the US will not be willing to provide the “unconditional support” for Israel that it has in the past.
A similar JPPPI publication is its Report 2008. This report makes many of these same points asFacing Tomorrow 2008 but also analyzes the position of Jews in the US. It is quite frank on Jewish power and the status of American Jews. Jews are important political players in the US. Despite their relatively small numbers, Jews are important in part because of “the economic resources they bring to bear on the candidates of their choices … [and] their prominence in American culture and society.” Well said.
Moreover, the Report notes that
while Jews tend to be wealthier than most Americans, they identify their long-term interests with liberal policies, and are regularly moved by the perception that the Democrats are the standard bearer of a number of traditionally Jewish ethical concerns. (This latter contention is of course  profoundly contested by Jewish Republicans, among whom are to be counted a large number of leading Jewish thinkers and intellectuals.) 
The idea that Jewish support for liberal causes stems from ethical concerns is profoundly problematic from other perspectives as well. The ethical hypothesis is ludicrous given that American Jews also support a racialist, apartheid, expansionist Israel. (See here for a discussion of Jewish ethics as fundamentally about what is “good for the Jews.”) Indeed, the Report notes that because both Democrats and Republicans are committed to Israel, Jewish voting is more determined by other factors. In other words, since there is no disagreement in American politics regarding unconditional support for Israel, Jews are free to vote their other ethnic interests — in particular the disestablishment of white America. 
My view is that the Jewish commitment to liberal politics and the Democratic Party stems from their fear of and animosity toward an America dominated by white Christians. As Elliott Abrams has stated, the American Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts” (p. 86).
It may indeed be rational for Jews to seek a rapprochement with white America, given that non-white minorities, especially Muslims, are unlikely to share the Jewish commitment to Israel. But the main stumbling block remains a psychological one: Can activist Jews overcome their gut feelings of hostility toward the West? 
Indeed, although not mentioned in the Report, the summary presented to the Israeli cabinet recommended “Enhanced ties between Jewish communities and the Hispanic and Afro-American communities in the US.” Implicitly, the idea is that just as Jews must prepare for the emergence of China and India as world powers, Jews must be prepared for the decline of white America.
Of course, it is no secret that the organized Jewish community has spearheaded the mass immigration of non-whites and that they have have forged close ties with blacks, Latinos, and other minority groups in the US. As I noted elsewhere: 
In recent years Jewish organizations have made alliances with other non-white ethnic activist organizations. For example, groups such as the AJCommittee and the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington have formed coalitions with organizations such as the National Council of La Raza and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). A prominent aspect of this effort is the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding, co-founded by Rabbi Marc Schneier, President of the North American Boards of Rabbis. The Foundation is closely tied to the World Jewish Congress which cosponsors the Foundation’s Washington, DC office and several of its programs. Typical of the Foundation’s efforts was a meeting in August, 2003 of the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the Jewish Congressional Delegation, and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus; the meeting was co-sponsored by the World Jewish Congress. The Foundation’s many programs include organizing the Congressional Jewish/Black Caucus, the Corporate Diversity Award, given to “a major Fortune 500 company committed to building a diverse work force,” the Annual Latino/Jewish Congressional Awards Ceremony, the Annual Black/Jewish Congressional Awards Ceremony, and the Annual Interethnic Congressional Leadership Forum. The latter project organizes an annual meeting of the NAACP, the National Council of La Raza, the World Jewish Congress, and the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium.
Quite clearly the various non-European ethnic groups are developing close ties and Jewish organizations are taking the lead in this effort.
Finally, it should be noted that there is no self-criticism in these reports — no angst about the ethics of Israel's horrific actions in Gaza or the erection of the racialist, apartheid state of Israel. Nor is there any self-examination of the power of Jews in American politics, particularly the issue of disloyalty as it pertains to the Israel Lobby.  
The portrait of Judaism is therefore part and parcel of creating a positive Jewish self-image. This one-dimensional "Jews-have-no-warts" image is a useful fiction for a group with such a large agenda in conflict with the interests of so many other peoples — from white Americans and other European-descended peoples to Iran and the Arab world.
It is an image that is aggressively enforced by Jewish activist organizations such as the ADL. A large part of Jewish power is the ability to create and enforce a positive image of Jews that is quite independent of the reality of aggressive Jewish pursuit of group interests.
The rest of us need not see the Jewish community in quite such a one-dimensional manner.

Talking with jews

Author: Kevin MacDonald

Source: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-talk.html

A topic that is not discussed enough is the screaming, in-your-face, hostile aggression that people must withstand when they dare to trample on Jewish sensibilities. We are not talking about the sophisticated rationalization one sees in the op-ed pages of the mainstream media, or even the smear techniques of organizations like the ADL or the SPLC. We are talking about interpersonal aggression. There is something absolutely primal about it.  
Now comes a refreshingly frank blog post by Karin Friedemann, an ethnically Jewish anti-Zionist. She notes the “violent intolerance” that defenders of Israel show towards people with different opinions.  
American Jews are actually being trained since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy Gentiles and Israel critics in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury…. 
The problem is that Gentiles are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the Gentile really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his "inner Jew" making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn’t care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what's good for the Jews. … 
I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next. He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it's truly scary. … 
If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination. …  
Zionists all believe in the myth of "1000 years of Jewish suffering" and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors' "unique" suffering. It's a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics. 
My take:  
·     These tactics are not restricted to critics of Zionism. As one who has experienced a barrage of hostile email from my faculty colleagues, I can certainly attest to this. One quickly notices that assertions of the legitimacy of white identity and interests will also result in a barrage of hostility. This  despite the fact that support for racial Zionism is strong throughout the entire Jewish political spectrum (see below). A correspondent sent me the following recently:
I have encountered many liberal, politically correct Jews who react vociferously (almost violently) to the most innocuous comments about any topic related to Israel or Jews.  One Jew upon my mentioning that my wife and I had been to Russia spent several minutes virtually frothing at the mouth about Russians.  Another upon hearing me say I was sympathetic to the problems of the Palestinians demanded to know who I was and how dare I say such a thing.  Often zero tolerance for any difference in opinion.
·       The media constantly present images of Jewish suffering—most recently the endless glut of Holocaust movies. But the media ignore instances, such as the early decades of the USSR and now in Greater Israel, where Jews have inflicted horrible suffering. Right now I am reading E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Effect on History. It is striking to read his account of Jewish violence against non-Jews in the ancient world, particularly the persecution of Christians whenever Jews had the power to do so. Long before Christians had any influence on Roman policy, Christians’ complaints about Jews were not stereotypes based on historical memory but resulted from direct experience with Jews: “Origen understood that Jewish calumny helped to cause Christian persecution, and that Jewish hatred was a fact of life for the Christians, continuing unabated after the repeated defeats of Messianic politics” (i.e., the defeats of Jewish rebels at the hands of the Romans in 70 and 135 ad) (p. 69). This is the basis of my concern on what will happen to whites when Jews become part of a hostile elite in white-minority America.
 
·         Non-Jews absorb these media images and as a result feel inadequate, emotionally intimidated. Eventually they identify with the aggressor, much like a browbeaten hostage or, as Friedemann suggests, an abused spouse. Or they maintain their friendships but studiously avoid talking about anything related to Israel. Non-Jews do the bidding of their “inner Jew” because they have internalized images of Jewish suffering. They therefore aid and abet Jewish brutality and aggression.
 
·         Non-Jews who persist in criticizing the organized Jewish community are threatened with loss of livelihood and social ostracism. As I noted in aprevious article the organized Jewish community does not believe in free speech. It is important to keep in mind that when Jews were dominant in the first decades of the Soviet Union, the government controlled the media, anti-Semitism was outlawed, and there was mass murder of Christians and the destruction of Christian churches and religious institutions.   
As Friedemann notes, the situation is nothing less than a sign of serious mental health issues for the mainstream Jewish community: “Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.”  
I think this is what happens when people who deal with Jewish issues finally realize that there is no hope for dialogue and begin to think of what to do next. Honest people finally realize that when it comes to critical issues like Israel and multicultural America, the divisions among Jews are an illusion. (Friedemann herself has renounced her Jewish identity.) As Friedemann’s husband, Joachim Martillo, notes, “Jews, who want to be decent human beings, have no choice but to renounce being Jewish and serve the anti-Zionist struggle (right now).” 
Exhibit A for this right now is the murderous Israeli invasion of Gaza. We know (see, for example, John Mearsheimer’s article  in The American Conservative)that this invasion occurred after a prolonged period when Israel restricted supplies into Gaza and then attacked tunnels between Gaza and Egypt. We know that the invasion was designed to “to inflict massive pain on the Palestinians so that they come to accept the fact that they are a defeated people and that Israel will be largely responsible for controlling their future.”  
The tone of Mearsheimer’s article suggests a dramatic shift in attitude where the usual inhibitions on public discourse are finally beginning to fall, even for a respected academic:  
There is … little chance that people around the world who follow the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will soon forget the appalling punishment that Israel is meting out in Gaza. … [D]iscourse about this longstanding conflict has undergone a sea change in the West in recent years, and many of us who were once wholly sympathetic to Israel now see that the Israelis are the victimizers and the Palestinians are the victims.
The gloves are coming off. This is what happens when smart and honest people who work hard to get the scholarship right are nevertheless smeared as anti-Semites guilty of the vilest misdeeds. Not surprisingly, Abe Foxman — a premier defender of the racial Zionist status quo in Israel — devoted an entire book to smearing Mearsheimer and Walt. Quite simply, there is no point to talking to such people or taking seriously what they say about us.  
We know that the government of Israel is firmly in the hands of the racial Zionists — followers of Vladimir Jabotinsky and his view of the racial distinctiveness and superiority of the Jewish people. Indeed, the only question in the Israeli election is which brand of racial Zionism will form the next government. One knows that racial Zionism has completely won the day in Israel when Kadima — the party of Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni and the Gaza invasion — is now described by Benjamin Netanyahu as the party of the left. (The LA Timesdutifully calls it “centrist” but, as Israeli peace activist Uri Avnery writes, Livni “cries to high heaven against any dialogue with Hamas. She objects to a mutually agreed cease-fire. She tries to compete with Netanyahu and [Avignor] Liberman with unbridled nationalist messages.”) Indeed, Netanyahu’s only worry is that the openly racist Liberman — a disciple of the notorious Meir Kehane — will take away too many votes from Likud.
The situation is analogous to a US election where Pat Buchanan is the candidate of the far left. (I can dream.)
Avnery analogizes the election to a joke where a sergeant tells his men: “I have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that you are going to change your dirty socks. The bad news is that you are going to exchange them among yourselves.” 
Once again we see at work the general principle that within the Jewish community, the most extreme elements carry the day and pull the rest of the Jewish community with them. As I noted in "Zionism and the Internal Dynamics of Judaism," "over time, the more militant, expansionist Zionists (the Jabotinskyists, the Likud Party, fundamentalists, and West Bank settlers) have won the day and have continued to push for territorial expansion within Israel. This has led to conflicts with Palestinians and a widespread belief among Jews that Israel itself is threatened. The result has been a heightened group consciousness among Jews and ultimately support for Zionist extremism among the entire organized American Jewish community."
The fanatics keep pushing the envelop, forcing other Jews to either go along with their agenda or cease being part of the Jewish community. Ominously, if elected, Netanyahu promises that a top priority will be "harnessing the U.S. administration to stop the threat" of Iran's nuclear program.
Incidentally, E. Michael Jones (The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Effect on History, p. 42ff) has expanded this argument to the ancient world. He shows how the Jewish community was pulled in the direction of fanaticism by the Zealots  who expelled the followers of Jesus from the synagogue and adopted a disastrous path of revolution against Rome, leading ultimately to the defeats of 70 and 135 a.d.
A good example of the schizophrenia described by Friedemann comes from the fact that around 80% of American Jews voted for Obama but around the same percentage blames Hamas for the escalation of violence and believes that the Israeli response was “appropriate.” These results of the poll on the Gaza invasion were proudly announced by Abraham Foxman of the ADL, an organization that is one of the principal forces in promoting a post-European America. The Jewish left is a pillar of multi-cultural America but strongly supports racial Zionism in Israel.  
This same schizophrenia was on display at a recent presentation at the Hammer Museum in Los Angeles by Chris Hedges and Mark Potok — he of theSouthern Poverty Law Center. The program dealt with the usual bogey-men of the organized Jewish community: Christian fundamentalists, skinheads, David Duke, and (I am gratified to report) The Occidental Quarterly. In a comment on the alliance between Christian conservatives and Zionists, an audience member mentioned (to stifled applause) that “There are Jewish fascists.” But the moderator, Ian Masters, saved the day when he stated that “the vast majority of American Jews are secular and liberal” — a comment that brought much applause, presumably because it reassured the many Jews in the audience that they weren’t like THOSE Jews. For his part, Potok, that stalwart warrior against white America, expressed his support for what he sees as a beleaguered Israel on the verge of apocalypse at the hands of the Arabs.  Schizophrenia indeed.
The politicians who are running Israel are, if anything, more racialist and nationalist than anything even remotely on the horizon in American or European politics. As Avnery notes: 
In every other country, Liberman’s program would be called fascist, without quotation marks. Nowhere in the Western world is there a large party that would dare to advance such a demand [to annul the citizenship of Arabs]. The neo-fascists in Switzerland and Holland want to expel foreigners, not to annul the citizenship of the native-born. …
When Joerg Haider was taken into the Austrian cabinet, Israel recalled its ambassador from Vienna in protest. But compared to Liberman, Haider was a raving liberal, and so is Jean-Marie le Pen.  Now Netanyahu has announced that Liberman will be “an important minister” in his government, Livni has hinted that he will be in her government, too, and Barak has not excluded that possibility.
The optimistic version says that Liberman will prove to be a passing curiosity. … There is also a pessimistic version: Fascism has become a serious player in the Israeli public domain. The three main parties have now legitimized it. This phenomenon must be stopped before it is too late.
So I have a suggestion for the Foxmans, the Potoks, the neoconservatives, and the secular Jewish liberals of the world: If you want to fight racism and ethnic nationalism, start in your own backyard. And my suggestion for the rest of us is to get rid of what Friedemann calls the “inner Jew.” I know it’s hard to do. But once you tune out the screaming hostility (and assuming you don’t fear losing your job), it’s easy. Just don’t expect a pleasant or rational conversation.

Europe Jewish leader sees similarities between 1939 and 2009, calls on governments to act against Iran

"Seventy years later we are witnessing a similar spectre of tyranny over parts of the world as the Iranian regime exports its fanaticism and culture of death around the world," said Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress (EJC) on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of WWII and the Nazi tyranny.

Notice how whenever Jews hate someone, they recourse to NAZIS in order to reuse the capital of victimhood for themselves and warrant a pavlovian response from its brainwashed goyim rushing to their defense. Quite incredibly, this has worked ever since its inception, tributes to decades of Holocaust indoctrination and massive brain washing through all means of disinformation at disposal. Another extremely important symptom of Jewish megalomania is the inversion of reality it operates with:

1. National Socialism was NOT a tyranny, except for the vermin it fought to eradicate (degenerates, Jews and defectives). Why is that the plight of 1% Jews so more important than the thriving of 99% Gentiles? Germany under Hitler rose to become Europe's greatest economical power, able to withstand five years of war against the whole world, in just a fraction of time and all by the hard work of One People, united in One Country, under the leadership of a truly Great Leader, the only to deserve the cult of personality it was surrounded with. Judeocracy, however, is a true tyranny, where Jews dictate to their Gentile slaves and the latter have no option but to comply.

2. National Socialism was indeed fanatical, but what is wrong with that. Aren't Jews supposed to be fanatical in their defense of Israel?

3. National Socialism was NOT a culture of death. Before the war, Germans enjoyed total security: there were no more executions than in Britain. During the war, Germans did "war crimes" against Jews and Russians, but given the hostilty they were met with by both groups one must simply interpret them as "CRIMES OF WAR", things that do happen and must happen between complete enemies. Judging by the large number of "survivors" left behind, they must have been hugely ineffective on this point. Because they were all done in TIMES OF WAR alone, the name "culture of death" is totally unappropriate. A true "culture of death" was the Bolshevik Judeocracy of Soviet Union, where over twenty million people were killed IN TIMES OF PEACE. Who were the creators of labor camps systems, who were the regime's most loyal henchmen, who volonteered into units that terrorized the Russian people, who accounted for the majority of sadistic tortionaries that plagued the Gulags, who has issued a vitriolic attack in the West of anyone daring to criticize USSR? It would be wasteful to hold our breadth until a Jew makes an appology for his nation's "crimes against humanity"...

4. Ahmadinejad's Iran and Hitler's Germany are worlds apart, but they happen to share one thing: leaders that love their people, which automatically makes them enemies of Jews.

"This, while oppressing its own people and most importantly building a nuclear weapons program that can threaten its neighbours, parts of Europe and moving its range menacingly further and further,” Kantor said.

More Jewish drivel to make goyim fight their wars:

1. Iran has no nuclear weapons. There is no proof it has, other than Jews' "trustworthy" words. Israel, however, has nuclear weapons.

2. Iran hasn't threatened any neighbors. Israel not only threatens its neighbors, it KILLS them outright (see the Gaza slaughter). Israel has threatened Iran with use of nuclear weapons. I'm waiting to see a fitting condemnation from the so-called "international community"...

3. Iran supports Palestinians, therefore is an enemy of Israel, but it is not an enemy of Europe by any logics unless EUROPE IS ISRAEL. But Europe is truly nothing but yet another Israeli colony, therefore its one-sided hostility towards "Iranian regime" is anything but unexpected. The odd thing is that the "Iranian regime" hasn't reciprocated the relentless smear attacks to which it's subjected by the judenpresse and has kept a civil attitude throughout.

"Although the two regimes and eras are markedly different, the European Jewish Congress calls on the international community to take a firm stand on the issues of similarities between the two.”

Here are the similarities between the two:

1. not being controlled by Jews

2. having leaders dedicated to their own people

3. having citizen instead of slaves

4. citizen willing to fight in order to keep their freedom

5. immunity to corruption from outside

These considerations alone would be enough to picture how being led can hold a different meaning than keeping slaves busy and well fed: it means awarding the people both the duties and the conforts of self-government. Whereas in the West the state conspires against its own constituents to make Jews happy, in Iran, the state IS the people.

"We now know that much of the bloodshed that began on this date in 1939 could have been avoided if some leaders had taken the Nazis at their word. So too we see people dismiss Iranian leaders when they call for the destruction of other nations and a call for regional and international hegemony," Kantor said.

1. What are the "other nations"? The one and only ISRAEL! Why are the Jews escalating this LOCAL conflict into a GLOBAL, unless they want the GOYIM to fight in their place and thus precious Jewish blood won't be shed.

2. When has Iran ever called for international hegemony? If I'm not mistaken, international hegemony is being held by JEWS!

He added: "Just like the Nazi military campaigns were predated by a putsch and brutal excesses against its own people, so too we see the Iranian regime steal power and crush any rebellion or differences in its nation."

By "stealing power", the Jew predictably refers to the "ellection fraud", when the candidate annoited by Jews has lost by a 2:1 margin. There is no proof this ellection was fraudulent, except the word of the Jew, reflected into their slaves. "Crushing any rebellion" refers to the opposition met against Western efforts to destabilize Iran from within. The allegations of fraud were a convenient condition of trying to use the pro-Western human capital into a direction Israel benefits from. Who was this pro-Western human capital? The dregs of Iranian society: students brainwashed in Western universities, whores in pursuit of "rights" and a majority of PAID AGITATORS. "Crushing differences" probably refers either to "human rights" issues, which are a misnomer of "slave rights" (being that none of these rights extend to challenging the master Jew) or more probably of not letting rebellion ran unchecked and unpunished.

The Paris-based European Jewish Congress called on European governments "to act now to prevent a repeat of the mistakes of the past and thwart a catastrophe in the making."

Translation: please fight our war!

"The greatest lesson of the past is not to wait until it’s too late because the cost is always far greater than taking no action," Kantor said.

The greatest lesson of the past is that Jews are lying the moment they open their foul mouths.

"The clock is ticking and all that remains to be seen is how people decades in the future will judge our actions when they count the cost of inaction and procrastination. This is a critical point in time and will determine the world in which we live."

Here I hope the Jew is right. If future will hold any improvement, which is unlikely, Jews will meet their fate and the world will be a merrier place...

Source: http://ejpress.org/article/38629