"Seventy years later we are witnessing a similar spectre of tyranny over parts of the world as the Iranian regime exports its fanaticism and culture of death around the world," said Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress (EJC) on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of WWII and the Nazi tyranny.
Notice how whenever Jews hate someone, they recourse to NAZIS in order to reuse the capital of victimhood for themselves and warrant a pavlovian response from its brainwashed goyim rushing to their defense. Quite incredibly, this has worked ever since its inception, tributes to decades of Holocaust indoctrination and massive brain washing through all means of disinformation at disposal. Another extremely important symptom of Jewish megalomania is the inversion of reality it operates with:
1. National Socialism was NOT a tyranny, except for the vermin it fought to eradicate (degenerates, Jews and defectives). Why is that the plight of 1% Jews so more important than the thriving of 99% Gentiles? Germany under Hitler rose to become Europe's greatest economical power, able to withstand five years of war against the whole world, in just a fraction of time and all by the hard work of One People, united in One Country, under the leadership of a truly Great Leader, the only to deserve the cult of personality it was surrounded with. Judeocracy, however, is a true tyranny, where Jews dictate to their Gentile slaves and the latter have no option but to comply.
2. National Socialism was indeed fanatical, but what is wrong with that. Aren't Jews supposed to be fanatical in their defense of Israel?
3. National Socialism was NOT a culture of death. Before the war, Germans enjoyed total security: there were no more executions than in Britain. During the war, Germans did "war crimes" against Jews and Russians, but given the hostilty they were met with by both groups one must simply interpret them as "CRIMES OF WAR", things that do happen and must happen between complete enemies. Judging by the large number of "survivors" left behind, they must have been hugely ineffective on this point. Because they were all done in TIMES OF WAR alone, the name "culture of death" is totally unappropriate. A true "culture of death" was the Bolshevik Judeocracy of Soviet Union, where over twenty million people were killed IN TIMES OF PEACE. Who were the creators of labor camps systems, who were the regime's most loyal henchmen, who volonteered into units that terrorized the Russian people, who accounted for the majority of sadistic tortionaries that plagued the Gulags, who has issued a vitriolic attack in the West of anyone daring to criticize USSR? It would be wasteful to hold our breadth until a Jew makes an appology for his nation's "crimes against humanity"...
4. Ahmadinejad's Iran and Hitler's Germany are worlds apart, but they happen to share one thing: leaders that love their people, which automatically makes them enemies of Jews.
"This, while oppressing its own people and most importantly building a nuclear weapons program that can threaten its neighbours, parts of Europe and moving its range menacingly further and further,” Kantor said.
More Jewish drivel to make goyim fight their wars:
1. Iran has no nuclear weapons. There is no proof it has, other than Jews' "trustworthy" words. Israel, however, has nuclear weapons.
2. Iran hasn't threatened any neighbors. Israel not only threatens its neighbors, it KILLS them outright (see the Gaza slaughter). Israel has threatened Iran with use of nuclear weapons. I'm waiting to see a fitting condemnation from the so-called "international community"...
3. Iran supports Palestinians, therefore is an enemy of Israel, but it is not an enemy of Europe by any logics unless EUROPE IS ISRAEL. But Europe is truly nothing but yet another Israeli colony, therefore its one-sided hostility towards "Iranian regime" is anything but unexpected. The odd thing is that the "Iranian regime" hasn't reciprocated the relentless smear attacks to which it's subjected by the judenpresse and has kept a civil attitude throughout.
"Although the two regimes and eras are markedly different, the European Jewish Congress calls on the international community to take a firm stand on the issues of similarities between the two.”
Here are the similarities between the two:
1. not being controlled by Jews
2. having leaders dedicated to their own people
3. having citizen instead of slaves
4. citizen willing to fight in order to keep their freedom
5. immunity to corruption from outside
These considerations alone would be enough to picture how being led can hold a different meaning than keeping slaves busy and well fed: it means awarding the people both the duties and the conforts of self-government. Whereas in the West the state conspires against its own constituents to make Jews happy, in Iran, the state IS the people.
"We now know that much of the bloodshed that began on this date in 1939 could have been avoided if some leaders had taken the Nazis at their word. So too we see people dismiss Iranian leaders when they call for the destruction of other nations and a call for regional and international hegemony," Kantor said.
1. What are the "other nations"? The one and only ISRAEL! Why are the Jews escalating this LOCAL conflict into a GLOBAL, unless they want the GOYIM to fight in their place and thus precious Jewish blood won't be shed.
2. When has Iran ever called for international hegemony? If I'm not mistaken, international hegemony is being held by JEWS!
He added: "Just like the Nazi military campaigns were predated by a putsch and brutal excesses against its own people, so too we see the Iranian regime steal power and crush any rebellion or differences in its nation."
By "stealing power", the Jew predictably refers to the "ellection fraud", when the candidate annoited by Jews has lost by a 2:1 margin. There is no proof this ellection was fraudulent, except the word of the Jew, reflected into their slaves. "Crushing any rebellion" refers to the opposition met against Western efforts to destabilize Iran from within. The allegations of fraud were a convenient condition of trying to use the pro-Western human capital into a direction Israel benefits from. Who was this pro-Western human capital? The dregs of Iranian society: students brainwashed in Western universities, whores in pursuit of "rights" and a majority of PAID AGITATORS. "Crushing differences" probably refers either to "human rights" issues, which are a misnomer of "slave rights" (being that none of these rights extend to challenging the master Jew) or more probably of not letting rebellion ran unchecked and unpunished.
The Paris-based European Jewish Congress called on European governments "to act now to prevent a repeat of the mistakes of the past and thwart a catastrophe in the making."
Translation: please fight our war!
"The greatest lesson of the past is not to wait until it’s too late because the cost is always far greater than taking no action," Kantor said.
The greatest lesson of the past is that Jews are lying the moment they open their foul mouths.
"The clock is ticking and all that remains to be seen is how people decades in the future will judge our actions when they count the cost of inaction and procrastination. This is a critical point in time and will determine the world in which we live."
Here I hope the Jew is right. If future will hold any improvement, which is unlikely, Jews will meet their fate and the world will be a merrier place...
Source: http://ejpress.org/article/38629
