Living in Hitler's Germany

A letter from Hans Schmidt of GANPAC 
Published in the Hoskins Report, Dec. 1993
Richard Kelly Hoskins, publisher

You asked for someone who had lived in Hitler’s Germany to tell what it was like. Permit me, someone who lived under the Swastika flag from 1935, when the Saar was reunited with Germany, to 1945, to give a short answer.

To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, NO military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to “snitch on our parents” was frowned upon. 

At the very time when America’s allies, the Soviets, destroyed most of the Christian churches in Russia and Ukraine, about 2500 new churches were built in Germany. NOT ONE Christian church was closed. It was the law that school and church had priority over service in the Hitler Youth. As late as the fall of 1944, the Waffen SS barracks in Breslau supplied two buses to take youth to either the nearest Catholic or Protestant church every Sunday. To be a registered member of a Christian church did not prevent advancement in the National Socialist Party. 

Germany was National Socialist, but free enterprise flourished during the entire Hitler years. No company was nationalized. No small businessman was stopped from opening up his own store. I myself worked during the war for a company that can only be called part of international capitalism. If you owned shares, nobody confiscated them, like the allies did in 1945.

The accomplishments of the ‘Nazis’ were incredible. Starting without money and with six million unemployed (a third of the workforce), they constructed the entire German Autobahn road network in a short span of 6 years – almost without corruption – while seeing to it that the new road system did not unnecessarily destroy either the German landscape, or wildlife habitats and forests. Two years after the NS were elected to power, conditions were so improved that workers had to be hired in nearby friendly countries to help alleviate the worker’s shortage in Germany. Germany was booming while Britain, France and the US were in the depths of depression. 

To help the workers get cheap transportation, the VW was designed and a factory was being built for their manufacture when the war started. Also, for the common people, villages of small single family homes were erected. The monthly payments were set so low that almost anyone could afford his own house. In Hitler’s Germany there were no homeless; no beggars. Crime was almost non existent because habitual criminals were in concentration camps. All this was reported in the newspapers and was known by everybody.

The German press during the Third Reich had fewer taboos than the American press today. The only taboo I can think of evolved around Hitler, and, during the war, there was a law that prohibited “defeatism”. This was because of the negative role the German press played in the German defeat of 1918. 

It bears remembering that the ‘European Economic Community” was first coined by the Third Reich government. I remember many articles, both pro and con about this subject. One should also not forget that during the war at least seven million foreign nationals (nearly 10% of the population) worked in Germany, either as voluntary workers (Dutch, Danes, French, Poles, Ukrainians come to mind), or as forced laborers or as prisoners. I know of no instance where foreigners were attacked or molested (much less killed) because they were foreigners. Speaking of the press, I have an article from 1943 in my possession that spells out how necessary friendship is between the German and Russian peoples.

Between 1933 and 1945 there was a tremendous emphasis on culture: theatres flourished; the German movie industry produced about 100 feature films per year (of which not one was anti-American. Only 50 of them can be considered pure propaganda movies). Some the best classical recordings still extant were made in Hitler’s Germany. Actors from all over Europe, but mainly from France, Sweden and Italy were stars in German movies. 

Germany always loved sports, and there was no lack of opportunities to partake in any sport one liked. The 1936 Berlin Olympics was merely a showcase of what transpired all over the Reich. In a book on these Olympics issued by the Hitler Youth that is still in my possession, Jesse Owens is shown several times and mentioned favorably. During the Schmeling boxing fights, we kids all knew of Joe Louis, the brown bomber. Nowhere did I ever read derogatory remarks about other races. Certainly the accomplishments of Germany and the Germans were given prominence, similar to ‘the ad nauseum’ statements of today that the U.S. is the land of the free, etc. In my ten years in the Hitler Youth (actually 8, since I obviously couldn’t attend while a soldier), the Jews were never mentioned. Other sports that gripped our attention were flying (there was Hitler Youth flying training with their own sail planes), car races (British and Italian drivers dominated) and riding.

Frequently I am asked about gun control during the Hitler era. Claims are made that Hitler could take power because he disarmed the German people. That is nonsense. In Germany gun ownership was never as prevalent as it is in America. I would say that for hundreds of years one needed a gun license in order to keep a weapon. On the other hand, my father owned an old pistol clandestinely (about which we children knew), and there were gun clubs all over the Reich. Furthermore, Germany was always a country with many excellent gunsmiths. It is doubtful that they could stay in business if the laws were too stringent. I would surmise that while Germany was Germany (before it was ‘liberated’ by the allies) gun ownership probably was far more widespread than is acknowledged today. Laws on the books were mainly to give the police a handle to arrest criminals with guns, not the ordinary citizen. Incidentally, just as Hitler had forbidden so-called ‘punishment exercises’ in the army (the brutal methods still employed in the American army), so had he forbidden the use of clubs by the police. He considered it demeaning to the German people. 

Finally this: I don’t believe I’ll ever see again a people as happy and content as were the great majority of Germans under Hitler, especially in peacetime. Certainly some minorities suffered: former parliamentary politicians – because they couldn’t play their political games; the Jews – because they lost their power over Germany; the gypsies – because during the war they were required to work; and crooked union bosses – because they lost their parasitical positions. To this day I believe that the happiness of the majority of a people is more important than the well-being of a few spoiled minorities. In school there should be emphasis on promoting the best and the intelligent, as was done in Germany during the Hitler years – a fact that contributed after the war to the rapid German reconstruction. That Hitler was loved by his people, there can be no question. Even a few week’s before the war’s end and his death, he was able to drive to the front and mingle among the combat soldiers with only minimum security. None of the soldiers had to unload their weapons before meeting with the Fuhrer (as was required when President Bush met with American soldiers during the Gulf War). 

Germany under Hitler was quite different from what the media would have you believe.

Incredible example of subtle subversive jewish propaganda at work

The picture below is of a book that is required reading in some of today's fucked up schools.

Stare at the picture for a while and see how many hidden messages you can find.

I am going to help you decipher it.

The first thing we ought to realize is that all these carpet-munchers and butt-pirates are all moving in one direction in a line.
This direction is taken as "forward". It symbolizes "progress". They are moving towards the left and it is not a coincidence. A group of freaks like this is the end result of many year of leftist egalitarian programming to create the communist new world order ruled by chosenites form Tel-Aviv.

The next thing important detail that we must comprehend is the fact that there is no identifiable jew in this motley crew of sexual deviants. The reason for this is because the jews don't want to be displayed, not even in a positive manner. Like a cockroach he scurries away from the light that exposes him and and tries to conceal himself. The jew is the little man behind the curtain, a frail and repulsive little yarmulke-clad rodent who uses the power of the media to make himself seem powerful.

Now let's go through this image from left to right.

Notice who is at the front of the line: A nigger who is also female who is also a queer who is also a crippled. All these attributes stack together to make her the pinnacle of diversity and the perfect icon for the multicult.

Notice how the flag she is carrying appears heavy and look like the wind is blowing is back a bit. This unseen wind is supposed to represent the "institutional racism" created by evil whitey to hold minorities back.

The next thing I would like you to have a look at is the pair of oriental homos. First let's discuss the male asiatic in the yellow sweater. If you look at his stance and the way he is pointing and also using his other hand to lead and also the way the flag is displayed, you will see that this image is reminiscent of the propaganda pictures made by the bolsheviks. In fact, if you look at the font of the text you will see that it is very similar to the font on old soviet propaganda posters. Also note that the flag is the same flag as the flag of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast.

This asiatic male is the real leader(not counting the vicious poisonous jew slithering around out of sight behind the curtain) of the ghastly pack of fudge-packers while the disabled Negress is only their retarded mascot. The oriental male has to use one hand to point the way and the other to urge the rest of the sexual diversity squad to move forwards. This basically means that the jew realizes that niggers and other low quality sub-animals cannot run any group or organization without running it right off of the cliff. Since Whites are either absent or groveling servants in the jew's fantasy vision for the world, the jew must use higher muds like chinks as administrators to keep things from falling apart due to niggerfuxxation.

Notice how the asiatic male's arm is about to reach around the asiatic female's waist? The jew would never display a White male holding a White girl, that would be politically incorrect and insensitive you see. The chink extends his arm to wrap around the whole group and hold them so tight as to crush them all into one ugly mass of brown sludge with slanted eyes and hooked noses and brillo wool and low IQ.

Further proof to corroborate my claim that the jew is admitting that different races are higher or lower on the totem pole is the fact that the asiatic female is the one pushing the negroid female lesbian(we may call her a lesbaboon or lesboon) forwards and her face is looking downwards at her.

Now we should examine the White dyke. Notice she has a book and she is carrying it as if she was in college and she was bringing it to one of her courses. The book has no title on it but we can safely assume that it is one of those loxist textbooks like "Whiteness studies" that teach the goyim to blame Whitey for all the problems that are in truth caused by either the jew(like the Iraq war) or genetics(like low black IQ scores).

If you look closely you may see that see has used chemicals on her hair to make it have the same curliness and texture as nigger-wool. This tells us that the jew is gloating about the fact that Whites have been cut off from their heritage and are now adopting nigger kulture.

This next part is critical to observe. Notice how the filthy nigger has his hand her shoulder. If a White male were to put his hand on the shoulder of a typical lesbian bitch she would scream and call him a "chauvinist pig" and press charges against him. This image shows that race trumps gender in ZOGland and that the White female homosexual must not protest for fear of being called "racist". Another useful bit of info we can glean from this is that a niggers' "muh dick" instinct always overpowers his homosexuality. Even if he likes men instead of women he would still fuck a woman if he was horny. In fact, it may be true that niggers are never either gay or straight but they are all bisexual. To be more accurate I would call them omnisexual because if something has a hole in it then chances are a nigger will fuck it. It is not uncommon for a horny nigger buck in Niggeria or the Coongo to fuck a rotting treestump or a hole in the ground.

The final part to examine is also the most imperative. We will now uncover the worst of the discreet jewish mind bending that lurks just under the surface of the image of the White and Black butt-buddies at the rear of the line. Look at the legs of the two rectal-raiders. The black legs look like they have some energy and are pushing forwards. The white legs look stationary, close together, weak, and like they might be toppled easily. This is all part of the diabolical plan of the kikes to indoctrinate the sheeple. Brown legs good, White legs bad. Brown legs good, White legs baaad.

Now lower your gaze towards the bottom of the picture. It took me a while to spot this. Look at the shadows! The White male has the smallest shadow indicating that he is the least important and is expendable to the jews. The White male passively accepts his status as third class citizen by drooping his shoulders. The White male has the most submissive and feminine posture out of all the people in this freakshow.

The last propaganda bit that the bagel biting artist drew in is the action between the queer nigger(we may call him a homie-sexual) and the faggot White. See that the White has raised his hand with one finger up. He does this to try to get the attention of the nigger before he talks to him and tells him not to touch the White lesbian bitch. The White's mouth opens but doesn't utter a word and he cowardly withdraws and say regrets that he even tried to confront a noble negro and tell him what to do, he feels guilt and shame and humility. Why couldn't he let the innocent black in peace? How dare he try to stand up for himself and get the girl's attention? The half-ape responds by thrusting his hand into Whitey's groin to punish him for his being "Rayciss". Whitey moves his pelvis back and covers his crotch with his hand. The reason why the jew drew this is to make Whites feel emasculated and insecure. The jew is telling White youth that standing up for yourself and being assertive is bad because it will make your nuts hurt.

Three other possibilities exist. The White may be masturbating and receiving the nigger's help to get an orgasm.
Or the White and the nigger are reaching their hands together to hold hands as foreplay before they have interracial buttsex.
Watch how the nigger is in front and he extends his hand back to the White to have the hold his hand and follow him as if he were a child. The leftist multiculturalist jews and race-traitors truly think of the Aryan race as children who need to be told what to do and prevented from having control over their own racial destiny. It may be that the White faggot raises up his hand with his finger pointed up as if he was meekly and shyly asking if he could be accepted into the diversity march. The porch-monkey rejects him and physically pushes him back and away from the parade of tolerance. After all, he is an evil White male who is a potential terrorist threat; he might be an evil hater who would blow himself up in the middle of the assemblage of sexually and racially diverse first class citizens.

We should now observe the letters on the shirts of the White and the negroid. Notice how the Nigger's letter is capitalized while the White's letter is not! The nigger has an "H" which may stand for homosexual. The White has a lambda symbol. The purpose of this symbol is to portray the White look as a nerd. Further proof to corroborate my idea that they are portraying the White as a nerd is that the White is wearing glasses and the nigger is wearing shorts. This gives the impression that the nignog is athletic while the White is a dork.

The easiest and most obvious thing to catch is how the White male queer is at the very back of the line. He is at the bottom of the shitheap in ZOGland. Truly whites are now the new niggers and they must prostrate themselves before the shitskins and jews and become their castrated slaves.

The purpose of this jewish psyop book cover is to humiliate White males and make them surrender their White females to the niggers. Never underestimate the power of suggestion. The jews know all about the phenomenon of "monkey see, monkey do" and use it to devastating effect against Whites. This image will subconsciously cause White males to acquiesce when confronted by a negro male. This is true because one time I was playing a video game and the main character liked to smoke and after playing for while I wanted to smoke.

You see when an image is made by a White it is straightforward and direct with no bullshit attached.
When a kike creates an image it always has sublimal messages and every single part of it has extra hidden layers of meaning.

My conclusion is that this image is not just for promoting homosexuality but also to denigrate Whites. It displays a microcosm of the hebraic dream of the jew world order.

Read the thread here:

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=712729#poststop

Goebbels' wife letter to her son

My beloved son! By now we have been in the Führerbunker for six days already - daddy, your six little siblings and I, for the sake of giving our national socialistic lives the only possible honorable end ... You shall know that I stayed here against daddy's will, and that even on last Sunday the Führer wanted to help me to get out. You know your mother - we have the same blood, for me there was no wavering. Our glorious idea is ruined and with it everything beautiful and marvelous that I have known in my life. The world that comes after the Führer and national socialism is not any longer worth living in and therefore I took the children with me, for they are too good for the life that would follow, and a merciful God will understand me when I will give them the salvation ... The children are wonderful ... there never is a word of complaint nor crying. The impacts are shaking the bunker. The elder kids cover the younger ones, their presence is a blessing and they are making the Führer smile once in a while. May God help that I have the strength to perform the last and hardest. We only have one goal left: loyalty to the Führer even in death. Harald, my dear son - I want to give you what I learned in life: be loyal! Loyal to yourself, loyal to the people and loyal to your country ... Be proud of us and try to keep us in dear memory ...

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Admist the usual bunch of treacherous womankind sucking up to anyone in power, there are these rare examples who are in themselves impressive by the oddity of such resoluteness among a naturally wavering group of people. By the undeterred way she chose death to slavery, this woman, along with her children will always remain icons of Aryan virtues, mandatory in the education of any young lady.

German TV star sacked for failing to speak negatively about Hitler's Germany

The offending statement:

... values like the family, children and motherhood, which were promoted in the Third Reich too, were later scrapped by the 68ers...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6986687.stm

Speaking the truth in "democratic" Germany equates prison or banishment (if you happen to attribute the situation to the right holders). To her credit, she hasn't repented or appologized. Also notice how beautiful she is, even at 48. One doesn't need a recourse to theory in order to prove that people of Aryan race are the embodiment of physical perfection and that, by virtue of this objective observation, are very much worth saving.

Incriminating Evidence of Israeli War Crimes in Gaza

Throughout its history, Israel has willfully and repeatedly committed crimes of war and against humanity, always with impunity. Yet under customary legal standards and norms (including Geneva, Hague, the UN Charter, S.C. and G.A. resolutions), it's lawless, a serial abuser, a threat to the region and humanity, mostly as an oppressive occupier. Attacking Gaza is the latest episode in its six-decade reign of terror satisfying the definition of genocide against defenseless Palestinian civilians. This article covers more evidence from some disturbing but unsurprising newly published information.

...

On March 21, the London Independent's Donald Macintyre wrote: "Israelis (were) told to fight a 'holy war' in Gaza....a religious war" against Arabs, according to a soldier citing "the martial role of military rabbis during the operation." In rabbinate literature distributed to the troops, the message was: "We are the Jewish people, we came to this land by a miracle, God brought us back to this land, and now we need to fight to expel the Gentiles who are interfering with our conquest of this holy land."

....

Again, the evidence is clear, unequivocal, overwhelming, and conclusive that high-level Israeli government and military officials planned and willfully committed systematic crimes of war and against humanity of such gravity that justice demands they be held to account in an international court of law - either the ICC in the Hague or a special International Criminal Tribunal for Israel (ICTI).

Doing so will warn future Israeli governments and all others that no one is exempt from the law and they, too, will be prosecuted if evidence provides justification. The rule of law is sacrosanct, especially for wanton killing that when ongoing for sustained periods satisfies the definition of genocide. Israel long ago passed that threshold. No longer can its lawlessness go unpunished.

Read the whole article, detailing unspeakable Jewish crimes against civilians in Gaza:

http://baltimorechronicle.com/2009/032509Lendman.shtml

Above the evidence for war crimes, Jewish criminal arrogance based on decades of total insulation from criticism easily transpires from quoted Israelis' declarations. Israel doesn't have to comply with human rights regulations, even though the very same Jews who live in or out Israel have always been adamant in their support of these groups when used against OTHERS. 

To better understand how dishonest Jews are, let's look on Vietnam War. Countless movies and documentaries (by Jews or their servants) have painstakingly attempted to demonstrate that American involvement in Vietnam was injust and inhumane, blowing out of proportion crimes against the Vietnamese while employing TOTAL SILENCE of communists' reign of terror in North Vietnam. The whole war has been portrayed in such a way as to fit Jewish propaganda of Evil Hatefilled White Men fighting an imperialist war against "Gooks", in contrast to the vailant communists trying to expel the foreign invaders. Unsatisfied because this war brought them no political gain, Jews have embarked into a massive "pacifist" undercurrent, which, thanks to their control of media, ultimately resulted into widespread popular hostility and America's withdrawal. Fact is Vietnam was the last war America has fought on its own accord, without the seal of Jewish approval. All of subsequent wars, mostly against Israel's enemies, have been for the Jews and nothing but the Jews, although funded not by Jews, but by the very same "Evil Hatefilled White Men" Jews keep on reviling, who are still the only PRODUCTIVE sector in American society.

50 million African workers invited in Europe by the EU

AN EU job centre for migrants 

seeking work in Europe has been opened secretly in the West 

African state of Cape Verde.

The project is the second phase of a Brussels tax-funded plan to invite more than 50 million African workers into Britain and other members of the 27-nation EU bloc.

The advice centre, based in the island nation’s poverty-stricken capital Praia, follows a similar job centre opened in the desert 

African state of Mali in October.

The project is part of the EU’s controversial plan to help Africans find work legally in Europe.

The centre will provide details of job opportunities in EU states, including Britain, and provide training and support for potential migrants. It is being heralded as a “pilot scheme” by EU officials for other job centres across Africa and Eastern Europe.

But last night the timing of the scheme to invite a new wave of migrant workers to Europe was called into question as tens of thousands fear for their jobs across Britain and other EU states in the gloomy economic climate.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage asked: “What the devil are we doing opening up job centres in Africa when we have 400,000 projected to lose their jobs in the UK in the next six months?”

Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “As people all over Britain and Europe face redundancy and unemployment as the recession bites, it is ludicrous that the EU is frittering away taxpayers’ money on such inappropriate schemes.”

The project is part of EU Commissioner Louis Michel’s master plan for the “mobility” of workers between African states and Europe.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/78180/50million-invited-to-Europe

How about "50 million african workers invited in Israel"... Or, in proportion to population sizes, "1 million african workers invited in Israel"?

Eighty years ago, a Communist Jew called Franz Boas, along from fellow communist Jews, started a movement called "Frankfurt School". Once transplanted into America, thanks to total Jewish support and an endless supply of treasonous politicians, it slowly became state dogma by 1960s and from then on, has colonized the whole world. All of the things Jewish organizations stand for today, the so-called political correctness, are traceable to this current of thought, which was from its inception virulently anti-Gentile not just in the political sphere (by creating and advocating multiculturalism as a way to break up nations) but also in the personal sphere (by creating and advocating feminism as a way to break up families). Their legacy is so prevasive that it has become internalized as normalcy by common unthinking people of our age. The Frankfurt School has introduced the idea that races do not exist (and those who claim they do are "racists", who are by definition White and deserving death), so that everyone is equal, hence our duty to welcome the whole Africa as a way to prove the sincerity of our beliefs in equality. Of course, not only are these things proven false by the whole body of science (the existence of races being supported by genetic evidence and the VAST intellectual inequality of races by every possible standardized test), the Jews have no duty to follow what they preach: they can continue to have an aggressive nation-state (in which only Jews are welcome), command Jews marrying with their own (countless dating sites for Jews to pair with other Jews but God forbid if we would advocate white only unions because that would amount into... guess what... racism) and do that with absolute impunity.

Why are Jews so reluctant to experience the "wonders of diversity" they keep on pushing on us? Because they know very well what multiculturalism is all about: whites no longer having any safe heaven, Jews lying unchallenged in a position of power and Blacks acting as vehicles of disarray, only to increase feelings of despair and worthlessness. Multiculturalism is a form of colonialism where, in contrast to its older version, the indigenous nations have everything to lose and nothing to win.

Whoever is not willing to take up his cross is not worthy of me!

In 2008, Horst Mahler has filed a complained against himself for "Holocaust Denial" in order to give a terrorized German nation an example that resistance is not futile, but the only way to insure the very survival of German nation. What followed is relatively predictable: Jews immediately called for "appropriate action", the vassal regime complied and he got what for a man of his age is a life sentence.

His Last Statement Before Verdict and Imprisonment on 25 Feb. 2009:
I am sending this at the last moment.
After this I shall no longer have opportunity to address the public, so I am using this opportunity to briefly explain once more what is really at stake here.
I am now being sentenced and I shall be imprisoned immediately.

Many of my supporters disapprove of what I have done.
They ask me: “Why are you doing this?”
Some of my supporters point out that I would be more effective on the outside than the inside of prison.
They say the government will now put me away and no benefit will come from it.
I explain to them that they are considering the matter from the wrong point of view..

The most important issue is no longer the fact that the present regime has taken away our right of free speech!
This state has always had the power to do that, in any number of ways, regardless of whether one is expressing an opinion.
Something greater than the right to utter dissident remarks is at stake here.
If one realizes, as I do, that the “Holocaust” Religion is the principal weapon for the moral and cultural destruction of the German nation, then it is clear that what is at stake here is nothing less than the collective right of self-defense, that is, Germany’s right to survive.
Survival affects everyone!

Does the world really believe that we Germans will unresistingly allow ourselves to be destroyed as a Volk, that we will passively allow our national spirit to be extinguished without a struggle?
What kind of jurists argue that self-defense is a criminal act?
As a Volk and a living collective entity we have a national and a spiritual nature.
The surest way to extinguish Germany as a spiritual entity is to destroy our national soul and identity, so that we no longer know who or what we are.
Destroying our national spirit is precisely the intent of our enemy in demanding that we unquestioningly accept his alien “Holocaust” dogma and desist from pointing out that his fantastic “Holocaust” never happened.
There is no evidence of it!
Once we realize that we are faced with the threat of annihilation, we no longer have doubts about who our enemy is: it is the ancient murderer of nations.
Once we realize this, we no longer passively listen to the enemy’s lies and misrepresentations.
We look for a weapon and a way protect our Germany, to deprive the enemy of the power he has over us.
Lo and behold, we have the only weapon we need to protect ourselves from annihilation.
We have he truth.
“The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!”

A rather unusual aspect of my life history is that I entered politics from the left of the political spectrum, by way of the Red Army Faction (RAF).
Briefly stated, the RAF took the path of armed struggle against “the System” as it was called in those days.

The idea that motivated us to take the path of armed struggle was our belief in “Holocaust.”
We actually believed what “the System” had taught us in school and what was constantly proclaimed in the enemy-controlled media.
Like others in the RAF, I believed this anti German propaganda.
As the American culture bringers say, "I bought it.”
I truly believed it as I sought a way to break out of the unbearable guilt complex associated with the “murder of six million Jews.”
I cannot go into the details of this period of my life here -- the point to be made is that I was a “true believer” in “Holocaust” when I was young.

In 2001, in the course of my career as attorney, I was asked to defend a musical patriot.
This was the singer Frank Rennicke, who had been convicted and sentenced in the lower courts for “Holocaust Denial.”
My response to his request was: “Of course I will defend you!”
The task of defending Frank made it necessary for me to investigate all the facts, evidence and allegations connected with “Holocaust.”
This is what my investigations revealed:
There is no supporting evidence for the fantastic allegations of “Holocaust!”
There are only proclamations released by the victors’ tribunal at Nuremberg to the effect that such an event occurred and was sufficiently “investigated.”
With his proverbial chutzpah our enemy tells us: “No other event in all history has been as thoroughly investigated as ‘Holocaust.’”
If we examine the actual facts, we discover that it is all a lie.
It is atrocity propaganda that is still being disseminated, 65 years after Germany's defeat.
When the servile Bundesgericht (German High Court) declares that a thousand "eyewitnesses" support the “proven event,” it is another bald-faced lie!

Our so-called Bundesgericht (High Court) understands perfectly well that our so-called Bundesrepublik (Federal Republic) is not a sovereign state and therefore not a legitimate government.
Prof. Carlo Schmid, the internationally recognized expert on international law and author of our Grundgesetz (Basic Law), stated clearly that the Federal Republic is not a valid state.
In a speech he gave on the occasion of its creation in 1949, he specifically describes it as an “Organisationsform einer Modalität der Fremdherrschaft” (Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign Rule), that is to say, a vehicle for domination by our enemies.
Prof. Schmid invented composed this diplomatic expression to avoid using the term “puppet government.”
Our Basic Law was not written by a convention of elected representatives and it was not approved by plebiscite.
Enemy occupiers imposed it on us and it does not meet the prerequisites for a legitimate state.
Since the Federal Republic is not a legitimate state, the institutions and stipulations that our enemiues forced upon us are likewise not legitimate under international law.

It is clear that the victors or victor of World War II (the only real victor was world Jewry) took great pains to assure that the basis for Jewish domination, namely the religious cult of “Holocaust,” would be legalistically unassailable.
This was their intent when they created the Federal Republic, and it is clear that the High Court long ago adopted a judicature designed to perpetuate “Holocaust.”
The mission to protect “Holocaust” lies at the heart of both the Federal Republic and the Basic Law.
This is the basis of Germany’s domination by its enemies.
Germany’s foreign minister Joschka Fischer explained this very clearly when he referred to “Holocaust” and sponsorship of Israel as the raison d’etre of the Federal Republic.

What is happening now is nothing other than the destruction of the moral foundation of our Volk through genocidal assault on our national soul.
There is nothing surprising about this.
We would have to consider our enemies really stupid, especially our most powerful and dangerous enemy, if he did not take decisive measures to maintain domination over us.
Our enemies did not launch World War II against us in order to abandon their war aims after the inevitable victory of their overpowering resources of numbers and materiel.
They went to great lengths to avoid giving us the possibility of exonerating ourselves ourselves from the Great Lie through authentic trials conducted by a professional and independent judiciary.
Our greatest enemy is not stupid!
He took painstaking precautions, and he is all too familiar with elaborate methods to assure compliance with his peculiar brand of "justice."

No one who perceives that our enemy is still perpetrating genocide against us as part of his war aims can expect a German to obey the proscription against questioning “Holocaust..”
No one can expect that a German who wants to be German will not object to this assault against our nation.
This assault is nothing less than cultural genocide, and it threatens us all.
If possible, I ask you to dare to imagine what necessarily follows from this, if it is really the case.
What a wretched excuse for a human being I would be if I, knowing of this threat to our nation in all its implications, would keep quiet and sink back in my easy chair and just wait for the day when the truth would come to light of its own accord!
Every German has an obligation to do his duty to the Fatherland!
We have a right and sacred to defend ourselves, to preserve our nation and our Volk!
In every civilized country, there is a legal obligation to come to the aid of those who are in danger.
In fact, the law prescribes punishments for those who fail to render aid.
Failure to assist and render aid is a serious violation of law; it constitutes a corpus delicti in itself.
I would be guilty of a serious crime if I failed to render aid to my Volk - if I kept quiet and failed to come to its aid, knowing that the monstrous fraud called “Holocaust” did not really occur.
In that case, I would be a truly depraved criminal!.

In the present situation, it would be pointless for me to plod along and attempt to gain a majority in this or that political party, or to found a new and independent party that would somehow make its way through our corrupt and labyrinthine parliament to repeal genocidal anti-German laws.
Working alone, my only course of action is to continue doing what I have done.
Relying on myself alone, I can do nothing except repeat the truth over and over again.
I have sworn a sacred oath that can be read on the Internet, our only source of uncensored information, that I will never desist from repeating this truth:
“Holocaust” is a lie, and so is the claim that it has been “proven.”
There is no supporting evidence.
In his undaunted defense of the Christian faith, the traditionalist Bishop Richard Williamson recently stated the same truth that I discovered long ago.

In the Rennicke case I was professionally obligated to investigate the evidence of “Holocaust” and it turned out that no such evidence exists.
After reviewing several similar trials, we were able to produce a letter written by a professor of contemporary history, Prof. Gerhard Jagschitz of Vienna, whose research had also led to the conclusion that there is no evidence to support "Holocaust."
When I contacted him he said: “Yes, of course, we already know that.”
Prof. Jagschitz had been commissioned by the court as an expert witness to determine whether “Holocaust” is “manifestly obvious” as an actual event of contemporary history.
He spent three years researching all the available literature concerning “Holocaust” in order to determine the actual truth.
After these three years he informed the court that he could no longer defend his original assumption in support of the validity of “Holocaust.”
He arrived at the emphatic conclusion that, within the guidelines of a society of laws, it is not permissible to use the “manifest self-evidence" of "Holocaust” as a basis for sentencing those found guilty of questioning it.
In those days it was Prof. Jagschitz and now it is Bishop Williamson, and soon there will be many other prominent persons who arrive at this same conclusion.

Self-defense is an inalienable right.
As a German who wants to be German I am personally affected by this assault against my Volk. The German nation is not only entitled to defend itself, it is in fact obligated to defend itself.
Because of our cultural substance, we as a nation in central Europe have the duty and obligation to resist attempts to destroy us culturally, to annihilate us as a Volk and a spiritual entity.
This is what is at stake!
I do not choose to wait for others to defend the German nation - I choose to do it myself!
I am telling the truth as I perceive it, and the truth is that the so-called “Holocaust” never happened.
That is the obvious reason why there is no evidence of it!
There is nothing to support “Holocaust” except the verdicts of Moscow type show trials.
These verdicts are constantly hammered into our heads by the Jewish media as “proof” that “Holocaust” was real and that there is an abundance of evidence to support it.

Those who enforces and perpetuate this blood libel is guilty of treason against the German nation.
Most notorious among these traitors are the judges of the High Court, who sanctify and reinforce the decisions of the lower courts concerning the absurd “manifest obviousness” of “Holocaust.”
This is worse than merely perverting justice -- it is carrying out deliberate genocide against the German people.
I have proven the guilt of the robed traitors in Karlsruhe numerous times and I shall continue to stress this even while in prison.

I am facing twelve years’ imprisonment.
How willl it all end?
I am 73 years old, and so this is a life sentence for me.
My sentence proves that in Germany today, life imprisonment can be imposed for anyone who refuses do obeisance to the Great Lie.
The Jews, of course, are always willing to “bargain.”
First the dissident is lightly punished, perhaps with just a fine.
Or there can be a prison sentence of just a few months, which can be probated.
One always has a chance of getting off easily by kowtowing to the Great Lie and giving assurances that there will be no more difficulties in future.
This is precisely what the enemy wants.
Anyone who is convinced that life under the Great Lie is not worth living must be kept behind bars forever.
Since I have openly expressed this sentiment countless times, knowing full well that the cudgel would fall, the enemy will most assuredly keep me in prison for the rest of my life.
The enemy must demonstrate to the cowed public what is really at stake here!
Obviously we Germans are now in a situation in which we must rot away our entire lives if we do not submit to the Great Lie.
Whatever happens to me – I can only say, as our Savior says in the Evangel of St. Matthew:
“Whoever is not willing to take up his cross is not worthy of me!”
We are not worthy to call ourselves Germans if we do not stand up for the truth, but unresistingly submit to the Great Lie!

However, I am confident that Germany’s historic plight is about to change.
The struggle over the authenticity of “Holocaust” and dominance of "Holocaust" dogma is now raging within the Catholic Church.
The Church is still a great power, even though its leadership has been corrupted and undermined by the Jews.
With its great wealth and hundreds of millions of faithful followers, the Church is the rock on which the ship of the Great Lie will crash and perish.

The Jews are about to experience their Waterloo.
Once “Holocaust” is openly discussed, knowledge of its true nature can no longer be suppressed.
When the Bishop Williamson affair reaches the point at which a sitting pope is forced to again excommunicate him, as the head of ADL (Anti Defamation League: the fighting organization of world Jewry) demands; or if, under pressure of the Jewish media and corrupt politicians, Pope Benedict XVI abdicates the Throne of Peter, this will be an excruciating shock for the Catholic world, and the truth will break through on this account!
Christian faith is based on the Truth, the Rock of Ages.
The Truth will make us free and the will to be free will grow stronger until it is irresistible, and then we will prevail.
As for me, I have done everything I could do.
I have set an example.
I have often said that ours is the easiest revolution that was ever carried out.
We need only for a few thousand persons to rise up and speak the truth as clearly and openly as Bishop Williamson has done and I have attempted to do, along with the others who have filed legal complaints against themselves for telling the truth and distributing Germar Rudolf’s “Lectures on the Holocaust.”

The ultimate victory of the truth is inevitable, as is the defeat of the global Zionist Empire.
However, we have no way of knowing how much more time must pass, or the exact circumstances that will usher in the victory of the truth.
We have to wait and see.
At present we are witnessing another collapse of the global Jewish financial system.
The Jewish power base, the temple of their god Jahweh–Mammon, has been struck in the heart by the collapse of their predatory banking system.
Jewish power is based on money power, which buys them control of the politicians and media.
At present they are losing this money power.
Once they lose it, they also lose control of government and public opinion.
Their control of public opinion has already been weakened by the rise of the uncensored Internet, which they are unable suppress.
When they lose control of the media, they will be in a pitiable condition indeed!
When that happens, the Jews will be grateful that we understand and accept their historic role in world redemption.
We recognize their destructive tyranny as a revelation of the path of God through the world to Himself, as the philosopher Hegel explained.
We respect the Jews as the followers of Satan and we accept them in the certainty that we can redeem them as well as ourselves, by bringing the Truth into the world through our deeds.
The Jews are in dire need of redemption, and they will one day be grateful to us!

http://rense.com/general85/horst.htm

Gilad Atzmon – War On Terror Within: The End of Jewish History

What we see here is a clear formation of a vicious cycle in which the Israeli and his supporters are becoming an insular fireball of vengeance that is fuelled by some explosive internal aggression. The meaning of it all is pretty revealing. Since Palestinians cannot militarily confront Israeli aggression and destructive capacity, we are entitled to argue that there is no Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All there is, is Israeli psychosis in which the Israeli is being shattered with anxiety by the reflection of his own ruthlessness. Being regarded as the Nazis of our time, the Israeli is thus doomed to seeing a Nazi in everyone. Similarly, there is no rise in anti-Semitism either. The Diaspora Zionist Jew is simply devastated by the possibility that someone out there is as ethically corrupted and merciless as he himself proved to be. In short, Israeli politics and Zionist lobbying should be seen as no less than a lethal Zio-centric collective paranoia on the verge of total psychosis.

Is there a way to redeem the Zionist of his bloody expedition? Is there a way to change the course of history, to save the Israelis and their supporters from total depravity? Probably the best way to pose this question is to ask whether there is a way to save the Israeli and the Zionist from themselves. As one may gather, I am not exactly interested in saving Israelis or Zionists, however, I do grasp that redeeming Zionists of their transgression may bring a prospect of peace to Palestine, Iraq and probably the rest of us. For those who fail to see it, Israel is just the tip of the iceberg. At the end of the day, America, Britain and the West are now subject to some similar forms of "politics of fear" that are the direct outcome of Neocon deadly interventionist ideology and practices.

....

I believe that the most interesting Jewish belief system of them all is the Holocaust Religion, which the Israeli Philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz rightly defined as the “new Jewish religion”. The most interesting aspect of the Holocaust religion is its God-figure, namely “the Jew”. The Jewish follower of that newly formed dogmatic precept believes in “the Jew”, the one who redeemed oneself. The one who “survived” the “ultimate genocidal” event. The followers believe in “the Jew”, the “innocent” victim sufferer who returned to his “promised land” and now celebrates his successful revival narrative. To a certain extent, within the Holocaust religious discourse, the Jew believes in “the Jew”, expressed as his/her powers and his/her eternal qualities. Within the newly formed religious framework, Mecca is Tel Aviv and the Holy Shrine is the Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum. The newly formed religion has many shrines (Museums) scattered around the world and it has many priests who spread the message around and punish its opposing elements. From a Jewish perspective, the Holocaust religion is a fully transparent expression of self love. It is where past and future merge into a meaningful present, it is when history is translated into praxis. Whether consciously or unconsciously, every person who identifies politically and ideologically (rather than religiously) as a Jew is, practically speaking, succumbing to the Holocaust religion and a follower of its father-figure “the Jew”. And yet, one may wonder, what about Kindness, is there any goodness in this newly formed ‘father-figure’? Is there any grace in this narrative of innocent victimhood that is celebrated daily at the expense of the Palestinian people?

If there is an end to history, the Holocaust religion embodies the very end of Jewish history. In the light of the Holocaust religion the “Father” and the “Son” unite at last. At least in the case of Israel and Zionism they bond into an amalgam of genocidal ideology and reality. In the light of the Holocaust religion and its epic survival ethos the Jewish State considers itself legitimated in dropping white phosphorus on women and children who they have caged in an inescapable open-air prison. Sadly enough, the crimes committed by the Jewish State are done on behalf of the Jewish people and in the name of their troubled history of persecution. The Holocaust religion brings to life what seems to be the ultimate possible form of insular brutal incarnation.

Historically Jews have shunned many Gods, they dropped Jehovah, they dumped Marx, some have never followed Zionism. But in the light of the Holocaust religion, while bearing in mind the scenes from Gaza, Jenin and Lebanon, the Jew may have to continue in the tradition and drop “the Jew”. He will have to accept that his newly formed father-figure was formed in his own shape. More concerning is the devastating fact that the new father is proved to be a call to kill. Seemingly, the new father is the ultimate evil God of them all.

I wonder how many Jews will be courageous enough to shun their esoteric newly formed father-figure. Will they be courageous enough to join the rest of humanity adopting a universal ethical discourse? Whether the Jew drops “The Jew”, only time will tell. Just to remove any doubt, I did drop my “Jew” a long time ago and I am doing fine.

Full article at:
http://palestinethinktank.com/2009/03/18/gilad-atzmon-%E2%80%93-war-on-terror-within-the-end-of-jewish-history/
____________________________________________________________________
The article is exceptionally well written and interesting in itself because it's written by a Jew residing in Israel, one of the very few who identifies the problem right to its root source (the Jews themselves) rather than projecting to "anti-Semites" (people who hate Jews for "no reason at all").

The Holocaust religion, although it has brought Jews worldwide power, has reflected into a total loss of self-criticism, which has never been a "strength" among Jews to begin with. Because it forbids anyone to acknowledge any negative trait on Jews with its creed of Jews' unassailable victimhood, the mere possibility for moral self-improvement is killed abruptly and thus Jews become even more disconnected from reality. One notices such disconnect when seeing the paranoid way Jews react to criticism: criticism is never a possible reality to begin with, but a personal attack fuelled by "anti-Semitism" that must be answered with smear, ad-hominems and calls for the one who issued the thoughts to be silenced for good. This relates to another issue not covered by the writer: under the auspice of Holocaust religion, rabbid hatred has become the glue that binds all Jews together and will, at some point, destroy those that have caused the world so much wrongdoing.

Jews say Germany still owes them for Holocaust crimes

Six decades and $100 billion in reparations later, tens of thousands of Jews say Germany still owes them for Holocaust crimes, the Washington Post reports. A 2002 law promised pensions for ghetto dwellers forced to work for little pay, but officials denied benefits to 60,000 for lack of documentation, leading many to decry bureaucratic stinginess.

Owners of stolen artwork say German museums have stonewalled attempts to reclaim their collections, and the situation is even more more muddied on 76,000 unresolved claims of property sold under duress. Claimants generally agree that while Germany has done much to atone for Holocaust wrongdoing, bureaucrats are reluctant to do more. “We have had the door slammed in our face and our history denied,” said one.

Read full article here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/24/AR2007112400612.html?hpid=topnews

Antology of Typical Nigger Behavior

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Israeli Spokesman Says We Control Stupid Americans

Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache, stated that she was not worried about negative ramifications the Israeli onslaught on Gaza might have on the way the Obama administration would view Israel. She said 'You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can't criticize Israel."

http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/9334-israeli-spokesman-says-we-control-stupid-americans.html

Stimulus bill gives $1 billion to Jewish social service providers

Stimulus bill gives $1 billion to Jewish social service providers

February 17, 2009

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The economic stimulus bill enacted by President Obama will provide $1 billion to Jewish nursing homes and social service agencies, according to the United Jewish Communities.

The funds come from the $87 billion that the legislation allots for state Medicaid programs as a result of an increase in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, or FMAP. An increase in FMAP was a top priority for UJC, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism and other Jewish groups that lobbied for passage of the $787 billion bill signed Tuesday by Obama.

The federation system receives about 1.4 percent of total Medicaid funds, so it will get more than $1 billion of the $87 billion provided in the stimulus package.

Jewish groups advocated for a variety of forms of assistance to vulnerable populations that ended up in the final version of the legislation.

"By ensuring that people get the assistance the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will offer, we’re doing a tremendous service by helping the most vulnerable and looking out for their general well-being,” said Rabbi Steve Gutow, executive director of the JCPA.

William Daroff, vice president for public policy and director of United Jewish Communities’ Washington office, said the demand for social services has increased as the recession has worsened, and the supply of resources to fund those services "has been taxed to the limit."

"The legislation signed into law today by President Obama will hopefully not only shorten the duration of the economic recession, but will also blunt its impact on those who have been devastatingly impacted by providing needed funds to social service agencies,” he said.

The Orthodox Union did not take a position on the bill but congratulated the president and Congress for its enactment and said "like all Americans, we hope and pray it will indeed spark an American economic recovery."

O.U. public policy director Nathan Diament praised the legislation for its allocation of millions of dollars to fund educational services and students with disabilities -- which are provided to private as well as public schools. But he noted "our continuing disappointment" that religious and other non-public schools were excluded from receiving money for the "green" school modernization program outlined in the legislation.

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/02/17/1003063/stimulus-bill-gives-1-billion-to-jewish-social-service-providers

Meet the Mandingos

Jeff didn't always like black guys. He was prejudiced—he admits it. As one of the few white kids at his school in the southeast of Washington, D.C., he fought a lot with black kids and was occasionally beaten up. When he later ran a string of gas stations, he was robbed: A black guy held a gun to his head and pulled the trigger—but the gun didn't go off.

"Honestly, that experience helped me a lot," he says. "I used to be very conservative. I didn't spend much money. Now I enjoy life. I'm much more open. Especially sexually."

It's a measure of how far he's come that Jeff (not his real name), now 40, is telling me this while we're watching a black guy have sex with his wife, Amber (not her real name), 37, at an interracial orgy. In Jeff's house. On his bed. The man screwing Jeff's wife is Branford (not his real name), a 30-year-old massage therapist who's not holding back—this isn't lovemaking, this is a proper pounding. Forget Amber—that's just how Jeff likes it.

Read full article here:

http://men.style.com/details/blogs/details/2007/03/the_provocateur.html

After reading this garbage, you almost feel like being poluted by having these degenerates displayed in full view, even while in printed form. On the other hand, it's "funny" to see how subjects are casting themselves to fit the mould of detestableJewish hate-propaganda, including the trio of:

- a weak impotent white male

- an independent white whore, who craves for black cock

- black stud satisfying white woman's needs

How many movies have with seen with these themes? Through obsessive repetition, people are trying to conform with the roles they've been assigned to, utterly oblivious of how deeply degraded they become. 

Palestine is Still the Issue

An hour ago I've seen an interesting show on one of most unexpected sources: History Channel (of which half of all top hour shows are about hitler, jews and holocaust). It is 90% truthful, exposing to full view Israel's atrocities against Palestinians, its utter disregard to other people's suffering (while lambasting a justiciary "humanitarian" attitude outside Israel), its colonial settlement policies, the truth behind the "peace aggreements" (which were nothing more than capitulations, according to which 90% of old Palestine was awarded to the Jew), the atmosphere of hopelessness, dispair in which Arabs of Palestine carry on their existence. It even features an interview with some top jewish politician who twists words in order to legitimize jewish crimes as (what else) "self-defence" in our "international struggle against terrorists (see 9.11)".

And on top of all, he uses the jew tube to argue: "Israel and its foreign lobby" insulates itself from criticism by branding its critics as antisemites. He shows how the West not only approved but it provided logistical and financial support for the growth of the bandit state.

The end is, however, dissappointing. He says we must understand Jewish sensibilities, as they suffered "world greatest genocide"... and they gave the world a tradition of "humanists" (by which I think he was reffering to the Frankfurt School likes). Regardless of his sincerity in this abject retreat, his show certainly deserves being seen. It is a well made document that must be shared by any self-respecting Aryan.

Author's name is John Pilger, a controversial Australian filmmaker who, according to Jewpedia, "is a strong critic of the institutions and economic forces that structure 'mainstream' journalism. He is particularly scornful of pro-Iraq war commentators on the liberal left, or 'liberal interventionists', such as Nick Cohen and David Aaronovitch.

He claimed in an address at Columbia University on 14 April 2006:“ During the Cold War, a group of Russian journalists toured the United States. On the final day of their visit, they were asked by their hosts for their impressions. ‘I have to tell you,’ said their spokesman, ‘that we were astonished to find after reading all the newspapers and watching TV, that all the opinions on all the vital issues were by and large, the same. To get that result in our country, we imprison people, we tear out their fingernails. Here, you don’t have that. What’s the secret? How do you do it?"

The full video is available here:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...57429802139093

Aherne: What are the proper paths of acquiring knowledge?

Approximating reality based on a cummulation of logics, reason and personal observation is the path one must take whenever the subject can be assailed based on observation. Here the key aspect is observation: it must be comprehensive enough to cover the issue entirely. Because reality is amorphous, every reasoning step peels the original of its rough parts (the same way a diamond ore is cut), turning it further away of its original. Therefore, not only one has to make sure his observation is rock solid, but that fewest possible logical steps are taken before making a judgment, in order to keep a closest relation to the un-peeled original. 

Now let's assume you have covered the issue entirely. The next step is to unify these views into a body of evidence and in order to do that, you must use logics and reason to guard against dead ends. Logics must be free from flaws, which is not very difficult. What's really difficult is to keep your subject away of infestation by personal motives. When you think properly, you must let evidence speak for itself. Your awareness of environment shuts down and a state of creative trance ensues. Trying to emulate creative trance for the sake of self-gratification is of course worthy of contempt. This isn't an end in itself, but an absolute requirement for a proper immersion into the subject. I find this aspect to be the most ignored, yet the cause of most flaws in apparently correct statements. In a few words: when man thinks, thinking is [I][B]for[/B][/I] himself and it takes a superhuman effort to circumvert its effects.

Another option is to build knowledge by trust. Instead of building the stairs, you walk on those built by others before you and build a few ones yourself. This way, in theory, knowledge builds incrementally and becomes least affected by personal motives. The flaw of this path is inherent to the mechanism it relies on: if it isn't kept in mint condition (which means that incissive thought is performed on every step, hardly a common scenario), it stumbles and derails to a dead end. This is the history of humanism: it started by acknowledging man's place in natural world (as a reaction to Christianity) and by using flawed logics and unwarranted premises it has become the quintessence of untruth under the veil of scientific respectability. What better proof for its insanity than affirming the nigger (which is hardly anything more than a talking chimp) is a white man's equal (whose intellectual and artistic achievements speak for themselves)? To arrive at such a conclusion, which flat out contradicts all forms of observation (empirical or scientific), speaks volumes how derailed thinking can become if trust of "respectable sources" is the pathway to knowledge. Hitler and all the great minds of 20th century have warned us of this plague in most unkind words and we are now bearing the fruits of our failure to deal with it sqarely, which has been cleverly exploited by the bloodthristy parasite that has always tested our strength.

So what is better? In every circumstance where subject can be known by a single person without reference to any previous views, personal observation takes lead because, at most, it carries the ballast of a single self. In every circumstance where subject cannot be known by a single person without reference to any previous views, scientific thought takes lead.

Aherne: Why is our society in decay?

How does one identify a society in decay?

- political signs. War, if any, is for defence rather than offence. Cowardice, in battle as well as in personal life, is the norm. People feel no reason to fight, partly because they don't feel the state as being the matrix of their existence, but a hostile enemy to be loathed instead. The state really is nothing but their enemy: its only concern is to keep itself or rather its elites in existence, no matter the costs. 

OUR SOCIETY: What are our elites, if not simple instruments of the Jew. Would they go in trenches and fight for ANYTHING? Hardly!

- social signs. Soon after massive differences in wealth appear, society loses its social homogeneity and people of different classes will only feel kinship with their own. Even though cases of enlightened elites do exist in our history, the reverse is much more common. Above all, this inescapable phenomenon makes a society more vulnerable to enemies from within.

OUR SOCIETY: What crime is greater in our current society than not trying to exploit every opportunity?

- moral signs. As a consequence of affluence and easy life, bad habits pour into the fabric of society. Law no longer has any resonance into people's minds. It is just something to fear and obfuscate, partly because the way it's applied reeks of injustice. Virtue (in personal and public life) is an object of universal mockery. Opportunism and extreme near-sightedness rules supreme. Men no longer have the energy to control their women, who appear more and more proeminent in public life.

OUR SOCIETY: How do people react upon hearing words such as LAW, VIRTUE and HONOR?

- intellectual signs. The ability to leap in thinking is exhausted. Theories' main goal is to GAIN ACCEPTANCE rather than achieve knowledge. Progress, if any, is produced by aliens somewhat acculturated to the dying civilization.

OUR SOCIETY: Even though our intellectual potential hasn't yet been exhausted, it has decreased substantially throughout the last century. A lot of breakthrough discoveries are being made by our traditional enemy, who was nonexistent as far as science is concerned during 19th century.

- artistic signs. In a way, this is a consequence of intellectual drought. The desire to produce objects of beauty is absent in a society where opportunism rules supreme. What continues to be produced is either inauthentic (plagiarizing the old times), or disgusting (attempting to produce something new for the sake of it). Because artists no longer exist but art schools do, standards are lowered to accomodate talentless individuals who use the word "artist" to defend their loathful lifestyles and advance personal agendas.

OUR SOCIETY: Modern art, in both of its vulgar (pop) and intellectual (modern art), is really the apex of worthlessness. Nothing so supremely ugly has ever been produced in the history of mankind.

- racial signs. This process takes a few stages to unravel. It begins with class division who undermines ethnic bonds. Being a citizen changes its meaning from the cell of a nation-state into a servant holding "a worthless piece of paper" (Hitler's beautiful words). Foreigners come in increasing numbers and their presence no longer alerts their hosts of an alien entity living in their homeland. This also happens because people's concerns in a collapsing civilization are consumed by survival-oriented strategies: everyone is on its own, your kin is your possible competitor no less than the foreigner. Foreigners sense host vulnerability and quicken the decaying process by undermining its foundations. After losing its ethno-racial homogeneity, a civilization is no longer able to defend itself.

OUR SOCIETY: What about multiculturalism? Even though knowledgeable people will object to this example as being a thing entirely engineered by the Jew, thus something unnatural, I will remind that precursors of "multiculturalism" have unfortunately ABOUNDED even before the Jew has taken hold of our countries. So many of our intellectuals have dreamed about a society where all races live together in peace and harmony that it is impossible to discount the phenomena as no more than a Jewish aberration. Accusations from within that our rulership over non-White peoples is too severe, that we are cruel and "inhumane" (a word which makes me :puke:) have existed and only intensified from 1500s into 1900s. This went even to the level of justifying acts of hostility against our people as understandable and even defensible on "moral grounds" (as if those savages had anything to do with morality). So one aspect of multiculturalism, its virulent anti-European rhetoric, is well founded in past. Another aspect very proeminent in multiculturalism, the idea that races are equal and whatever difference exists is due to environment has been gaining proeminence since the French revolution (who issued the declaration of Human Rights). So, once again, it's an old ilness left untreated. We must look onto the way America evolved to get a better picture: from a society which was entirely formed of British people and their Negro slaves (1800s), into a society who welcomed people of Protestant descent (British, German, Scandinavian, 1840s), into a society who welcomed people of European descent (1900s), into a society who welcomed people of all descents (1960s). What we have here is a process of lowering standards of admission, out of whom only the latter was performed under Jewish influence. Current "White Nationalists" themselves reflect this process of lowered standards: they accept everyone of European lineage as their own, even though the latter has no ethnic or racial connotation. In a way, white nationalism represents a reaction to multiracialism rather than the idea of multiculturalism. [I]A solid judgment finds the start of American decay the moment its accepted people of non-British descent onto its soil[/B] (that moment, it ended being a true nation).

What causes a society to decay?

CASE #1: A civilization falls ill and dies a natural death. As you may have noticed, in all of the omnious signs given above, something is common... It is affluence! Just like a well fed tiger will just sit around and sleep all day long, the effect of affluence among humans is to place them back where they started from. Once they have their basic needs fulfilled, humans lose any concerns other than keeping this state until they die.

CONCLUSION #1: It is essential to engineer a system where excess wealth is redistributed and opportunism is actively discouraged. What the state allows nothing more than what's absolutely necessary for someone. Frustration from lack of personal achievement should be directed into a culture of self-restraint, bravery and dedication to self-improvement. This brings out the best of ourselves and provides a rock-solid foundation for a society to move forward.

CASE #2: A civilization comes at an abrupt end by intrusion from outside (the Aztec).

CONCLUSION #2: This is NOT our case, no matter how much we would like to believe it. We haven't been defeated by anyone! Our countries, in theory, rule the earth:) That our leaders are remote controlled by an enemy for within, working to accelerate our distruction is a whole different issue.

CASE #3: A civilization comes at an abrupt end by an ecological disaster (the Maya).

CONCLUSION #3: This is NOT our case, obviously.

What caused our civilization to fall ill?

REASON #1: Affluence. It kills the soul, effeminates the mind and shuts down thinking. A cause common with other historic civilizations, Romans being a classical example.

REASON #2: Christianity/Humanism. Its pernicious concepts have poluted the minds and souls of the best of our people, turning them into pitiful weaklings finding confort in a bizarre combination of self-hatred and martyrdom.

REASON #3: The Jew. Our traditional enemy who has the habit of poisoning the fountain we drink from. It failed to be dealt with in an exemplary fashion because of REASON #2.

REASON #4: Industrialization. It made it POSSIBLE for people to travel great distances (trains, automobiles, plains). It also provided a booming job market, who made it ATTRACTIVE for people to migrate. This has had extremely negative effects on the long terms for the peoples involved. One country loses valuable workforce, while the other paves the ground for civic discontent over immigrants getting natives' jobs because they are paid less. Multiculturalism, or, worse still, multiracialism spell the end of a nation.

General conclusion

Above all, we have lost our drive to wage war. Warfare has always been a key element for the upward dynamics in Aryan societies. When Aryans no longer fight, their society, their virtues and laws, degrade dramatically and their world is taken over by social detritus from within: foreigners, with active support from those among ourselves who take some profit by the way things go.