After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation

Author: Giles MacDonogh

Buy the book here:
http://www.amazon.com/After-Reich-Giles-MacDonogh/dp/0465003370

Excellent review here:
http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_1/after_the_reich.php

---

COMMENT

This book details the atrocities commited against the German people by Allied troups AFTER the nation declared its defeat following Hitler's death, a chapter of history that has so far remained virtually hidden from public view due to its "sensitivity" to Jews. Now... If someone absorbed into jewish propasphere would be exposed to this "niche" of reality, they would either flat-out deny the facts exposed, or trivialize/minimize them as mere victor's wrath upon "the evil nazis". The problem is these things have happened, and on a scale that far exceeds the one casually mentioned in "history" books:
- the systematic rape of German women by Soviet troops, inspired by jewish Minister of Soviet Propaganda Ilya Ehrenburg with words such as "...the Germans are not human beings... nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses." or "that blonde hag is in for a bad time."
- the starvation campaign by Western troops, followed by highly unfair show trials against "politically unacceptable" person, whose declarations of guilt were obtained through torture, by Jewish torturers (something hinted even by Jews, who are still feeling they did nothing wrong with that). Starvation was inspired by jewish Walther Morgenthau, "calling for Germany to be dismembered, partitioned into separate independent states, stripped of all heavy industry and forced to return to a pre-Industrial Revolution agrarian economy", only to be reconsidered when America (still not entirely controlled by Jews at that time) decided it was better to exploit Germans into eternal slavery rather than killing their nation once and for all.
- the cultural mutilation of German people by rewriting their history to become a vehicle of guilt. This trait is common to both Communist and Capitalist occupied Germany, but it was even more profound in the latter, where Jewish control was so profound, that a law exists to this day according to which anyone who criticises Jews is an enemy of the state and liable to prison. Another trait in common between the two occupiers was how they saw German nationalism as the main cause behind the rise of "Nazi dementia", which resulted into a total ban on anything that might hinder in their attempt to eternally humiliate German nation. Cultural mutilation took all the aspects proper to a totalitarian state: 1. neutralizing anyone in the elite with a sense of honor while in the same time encouraging opportunists to fill the vacated seats as long as they said what they ought to; 2. burning all books whose existence was regarded as a direct threat to the status quo, while shamefully censoring remaining materials of all "unacceptable" elements; 3. after the link with the past is severed, teach falsehood as truth and ban truth as falsehood.
- the moral mutilation of German people, by encouraging all forms of vice as a form of "new morality" and treat honor and virtue as things of the "Nazi" past to be ashamed of. By letting slaves' base needs run their course, this has been an immediately effective method to keep German people controlled eversince, which later got "exported" to the whole west through the same Jewish source, as a lasting punishment for the disease they have once chosen to carry.
- the political mutilation of German people, by keeping Germans divided into multiple countries and encouraging false "identities" between puppet states (Austrian vs. German) or even within them (through regionalism), coupled with the loss of a third of its territory in favor of Poland and Czechoslovakia, followed by the exodus of nearly 20 million people, the greatest in the history of mankind, but one which noone exposed to Jewish media has heard of before.
- the racial mutilation of German people, by encouraging interracial rape/relationships as a way to "cure them of nationalism". The half breeds produced are then regurgitated by the controlled media as "examples to be followed upon".

There are aspect only hinted in the book or even missing. One of them is Jewish involvement as a necessary cause behind the treatment Germans received. Worse still, the author somewhat explains away the crimes as victors' wrath. However, this position is vulnerable at best:
1. victors claimed to be the moral opposite of nazis, which is true only in the sense that allies projected their crimes onto nazis. They were NOT expected to commit the senseless rampage they condemned Nazis of doing.
2. the extent of their crimes far exceeds whatever Allies had to retaliate Germans for. It more looks like a pretense to enact JEWISH revenge, even though Jews were not (officially) part of the war.

Because modern Germany is on all grounds the direct inheritor of those policies enacted by Allies after they saw themselves as undisputed rulers of German land, this history book is actually a book of the present too, explaining the causes behind the curious stance adopted by a regime which manages to equal Jews in its anti-German hatred.

Jewish philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy affirming his people support for "minorities"

---

COMMENT

The whole discourse is priceless as testimony of Jewish audacity and self-delusional grandeur. This "French" philosopher (paid by France to slander the French) attended one of the many meetings Jews as an ethnic group are entitled to, called "global jewish challenges" (try to imagine a "global aryan challenges"...).

Here are the main points he adresses:
- The need for jews to rally against "the new anti-semitism", a world conspiracy disguised in anti-Zionism
- Jewish support for nonwhite "minorities" across the world, including France
- Jewish support for "women rights"
- Jewish support for a "westernized" (actually the word is JUDAIZED) clique brainwashed in western schools as a tool to drive a wedge through Islam and thus further isolate anyone who is not their servant.
- Jews are a beacon of light upon humankind, according to Jews...

Court punishes 'Mein Kampf' publisher based on... copyright violation

A Polish court has convicted a man who published Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf of copyright infringement and given him a three-month suspended prison sentence. A court in the southwestern city of Wroclaw also fined the man 10,000 zlotys ($3,200) on Monday.

The man, identified only as Marek S. in line with Polish privacy laws, was sued by the German state of Bavaria, which holds the rights to the book. The defendant published 20,000 copies of Mein Kampf in 2005 without seeking Bavaria's permission. His motive was profit, he said. He will have to serve the prison term if he tries to publish more copies in the next two years. Mein Kampf is banned in Germany and Bavaria is seeking to block it in other countries for fear it fears it could be misused by right-wing extremists. The 1925 book expresses Hitler's desire to exterminate Jews and occupy territory in Eastern Europe.

Source:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1243259515104

---

COMMENT

How could Germany, which is now an essentially Jewish state, hold any rights onto a book that represents not only its negation, but also a subject of prosecution. Would Hitler, the real copyright holder, or its descendants even consider forfeiting their legal rights over the sworn enemies of the German people? In their desperation to use their colony as an outpost of fighting "antisemitism", Jews have created something that defies logic: holding copyright permission on something you outlaw.

Israel: Ministers to vote on 'loyalty oath'

Foreign Minister and Israel Beiteinu chair Avigdor Lieberman's proposed "loyalty oath" for Israeli citizens will be brought up for a vote at a cabinet meeting early next week.

The party said it planned to seek preliminary approval from a ministerial committee on Sunday. If passed, the law would oblige every Israeli citizen, including Arabs, to take the oath and sign a statement.

"Receiving citizenship under law will be contingent on a loyalty oath," the proposed draft read. The draft also includes a clause on the wording of the loyalty oath, likely to cause disagreements: "I commit to being loyal to the State of Israel as a Jewish, democratic and Zionist state, to its symbols and values and to serve the country as needed through military service or an alternative service, as decided by law."

In the proposed draft of the legislation, signature of the oath is conditional upon receiving an identification card for those born in Israel. Furthermore, the law would bestow considerable power upon the interior minister who would have the right to revoke the citizenship of any person who fails to fulfill their commitment to serve in the IDF or any alternative service.
MKs David Rotem, Robert Iltov, Moshe Matalon and Alex Miller wrote in an amendment to the proposed bill, stating that "the connection between citizenship and loyalty is impossible to break."

Source:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle2FShowFull

---

COMMENT

How about:

"I commit to being loyal to the State of France as a French, democratic and Nationalist state, to its symbols and values and to serve the country as needed through military service or an alternative service, as decided by law."

Will Jews ever let that happen?

German Patriots Turn Selves In For 'Holocaust Doubting'

Author: Kevin Käther

To my dear comrades in the struggle for a free Germany in a free Europe. The appeal of my self-accusation trial begins on 26 May.  The corpus delicti of my original show trial was my sending copies of Germar Rudolf's Lectures on the Holocaust through the mail.  At the end of that trial I was sentenced to eight months in prison, even though I provided proof that the contents of Rudolf's book are factual.

All my evidentiary motions were summarily rejected, as is inevitably the case in inquisitorial trials. In Germany, we no longer have court trials conducted according to the established rules of a nation of laws. Today, we have tribunals that follow the principles of the "Holy Inquisition," or Nuremberg show trials..

In response to the convictions of freedom fighters Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zündel, Sylvia Stolz and Horst Mahler, I sent copies of Rudolf's book to Lea Rosh, Wolfgang Benz and Ernst Nolte in November 2007 and filed a legal complaint against myself for the "criminal act" of "Doubting Holocaust." This was my first contribution to the national effort of demolishing the historical lies that have devastated our country for three generations. As a true German, I feel obligated to assist and protect my fatherland and help it find its way back to the path of integrity.

Horst Mahler, who is 73 years old, was sentenced to 13 years in prison for the nonviolent offense of disseminating politically incorrect ideals. This amounts to a life sentence for a truly Orwellian crime. Mahler's sentence illustrates better than anything else the imperative to struggle against the lies of Germany's vicious enemies. What is at stake here is not just an abstract struggle for human rights, but the very survival of our nation. Phony guilt has been inculcated into our Volk and outrageous lies are killing the soul of the German people.  As a German I have resorted to our inalienable right of self-defense in opposing these devastating lies of our sworn enemies.

It is an honor for me and my comrades to state the truth on behalf of our country and to go to prison if need be. Our descendants will thank us for what we are doing.

The following dates have been set for my upcoming appeal trial:First date: 26 May 2009 at 13:00 O'clock, Courtroom 820, Tiergarten District Court.
Second date: 09 June 2009 at 09:00 O'clock, same courtroom.

Let me add that no act of intimidation is too perfidious for the Berlin District Attorney. 

In the course of my defense in my first trial I was indicted on additional charges for including empirical facts in my evidentiary motions, the mere mentioning of which is a criminal offense.
It is now a crime to defend oneself in court! This gives a glimpse into the infinite nature of official repression and injustice in Germany! It is still more evidence, if more evidence is needed, that "Holocaust" jurisprudence is purest tyranny. The defendant is allowed no defense at all -- all attempts are automatically converted into additional criminal charges!

Our justice system has abolished itself and mutated into an immense criminal enterprise. I pray that God will have mercy on these high-and-mighty despots in black robes. They are going to need it!

I am looking forward to a very lively Tuesday!

With comradely greetings,

Kevin Käther
Berlin, den 24.05..09

Source:
http://www.rense.com/general85/germany.htm

Carleton Coon, the last great racial anthropologist

Aside from Coon's discontent over the decision of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists to censure "Race and Reason", which caused him to resign, some of his other works were discounted because he wouldn't agree with the evidence brought forward by the works of people such as Franz Boas (jew), Stephen Jay Gould (jew), Richard Lewontin (jew), Lieberman (jew) and others which played down or even dismissed race as a valid concept with which to partition biodiversity. In his autobiography, Coon tells us he was offered to write an article about race relations, but he was neither paid nor was the article published because he wrote races had a natural inclination for separatism.

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carleton_S._Coon

_________________________________________________________________

COMMENT

As you all can see, the Jews asked him to write an abject apology (pardon, "article on race relations"), in which he had to do the usual job of incriminating a whole race for perceived "past injustices". Being a honorable person, instead of an apology he offered the kikes a stronly backed scientific view on race and biological differences between them. As Coon pointed out in his book Races of Europe, if classification of man would be held to a same standard as classification of canids, one would distinguist different SPECIES rather than just races of man.

As a sidenote, Carleton Coon was the leading scientist in racial anthropology, one of the few who left biases behind and attempted to integrate all evidence into a meaningful system. He came under fire by Jewish establishment, because his scholarship into race damaged their reputation built upon denial of race (hence "cultural anthropology", a thorougly Jewish "science", according to which race is a cultural construct created by Europeans to justify exploitation and colonialism).

Now a superb quote from his book, "The Races of Europe":"If Africa was the cradle of mankind, it was only an indifferent kindergarten. Europe and Asia were our principle schools."

Jewish "democracy" in Britain at work: Thought police muscle up in Britain

BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely. 

There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.

Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.

The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".

In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.

Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.

Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."

A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boya "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."

Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.

Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.

A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function. A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.

Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.

There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse. A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.

Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.

This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.

Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.

Hal G. P. Colebatch's Blair's Britain was chosen as a book of the year by The Spectator in 1999.

Source: 
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25361297-7583,00.html?from=public_rss

Israel: Iran trying to do 'what Adolf Hitler did to Jewish people'

The Israeli government used the potent, emotionally-charged platform of Auschwitz concentration camp today to rebut President Ahmadinejad’s latest tirade against the Jewish state.

Standing under the notorious wrought-iron gateway to the camp with its cynical slogan “Arbeit Macht Frei” (Work Makes Free), the Israeli Deputy Prime Minister, Silvan Shalom, said Iran was advocating no less than the Nazi-style elimination of the Jews.

“What Iran is trying to do right now is not far away at all from what Hitler did to the Jewish people just 65 years ago,“ said Mr Shalom.

Source:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6142841.ece