The president of France: not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country

Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and metissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt. In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don't, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764
___________________________________________________________________
My comments:
1. Since "there is no such thing as race", why so much promotion for "diversity" and "metissage"?
2. The view that the French people need to intermarry racially is "racist", since it implies French people to be of one race (white), thus deprives "those that only came here to take jobs that the French wouldn't take" of their "dignity as Frenchmen".
3. Is this measure supported in any way by the majority of French citizen? No! Who supports it? Primarily those of same ethnic background as Sarkozy, the ones that cannot be named or being called upon their actions.
4. How can anyone justify "preference in job hiring" in FRANCE for the... NON-FRENCH? Oh wait... I know! The French are not allowed to have a living space: they must proceed into their annihilation with a big smile on their face and lots of pockets unloaded.

To give you a sense of perspective, let's try this the other way:
Recently the prime minister of Israel announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and metissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to Palestinians in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt. In his message he insisted that the Jewish people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don't, and that not to intermarry with Palestinians is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for Palestinians in job hiring with that of the need for the Jewish to intermarry racially.

Hmm... Sounds "realistic", doesn't it?

Q.E.D.